70. Some people think that employers should not care about the way their employees dress, because what matters is the quality of their work. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the state of the art society, coming along with the briskly modifying into a brand new era full of innovation of human civilization, the masses question whether the dress is an indispensable aspect in the fundamental notion of the working environment rather than the qualified capability. From a personal perspective, I partly agree with the statement mentioned above.
To open the deliberation, it is irrefutable that personal proficiency is always the first and foremost factor that is prioritized when recruiting. Obviously, working productivity seems to be defined by individuals who have been well-trained. Simultaneously, the ultimate purpose absolutely is maximizing the revenue and covering the running cost. Therefore, whatever the outfit of the employee and all the related external factors, if they can complete the task perfectly, it will be a tremendous opportunity for recruiters. Furthermore, In some particular circumstances and workplaces, the dress does not play a pivotal role that requires careful consideration. Especially in the covid-19 pandemic, a huge number of people are remote working from their home via an omnipresent Internet.
On the flip side, notwithstanding the aforementioned tendency, people should not overlook the importance of outfits in general and uniforms in particular. The careful preparation of uniform and dress is a gesture of respectability and responsibility for the whole company. Undoubtedly, the dress is the most straightforward element to become a judgment for personal characteristics. It represents the attitude and how they have dedicated to the company. On a long-term consideration, customers regard a business that lacked a united attribute as unreliable and directly led to the loss of reputation.
To recapitulate, whilst the qualified capability that an employee provides for the firm is indispensable, I wholeheartedly believe that the outfit is an intermediary to boost the prosperity of the business.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 8, Rule ID: STATE_OF_THE_ART[1]
Message: Did you mean 'state-of-the-art'?
Suggestion: state-of-the-art
In the state of the art society, coming along with the briskly ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...irectly led to the loss of reputation. To recapitulate, whilst the qualified ca...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, look, so, therefore, well, in general, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68243243243 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.58273801545 2.80592935109 128% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614864864865 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1487783645 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.142857143 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121992177916 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0347796811132 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0320685203045 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0597665468612 0.151304729494 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307572481636 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.