After graduation many students take a year to travel Some think that it would be more useful to work for a year To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

After graduation many students take a year to travel. Some think that it would be more useful to work for a year.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people who are in the young generation want to travel to other countries to explore new things in the world in their gap year. However, some believe that they should learn from work in their gap year. In my opinion, it is like the coin has two sides, travelling to other countries and working in a gap year is beneficial for students who have just graduated from high school.
People visiting some countries can have many useful skills which will be helpful in their life. Their self-development is great after they travel to some countries, which are entire the world. For example, people can have planning skills when they travel to other countries if they learn from other people. Moreover, it is an excellent chance to explore themselves. People can clarify themselves throughout their trips. They can understand what they want to do and what they are interested in.
However, investing time and efforts in working to earn money and improve self-management is a wonderful choice. Admittedly, people can have a large amount of money after they have learned some money saving methods from experienced-people. Moreover, the money that they saved can use for their enjoyable activities and their study. Furthermore, they can learn how to manage themselves by instructing from their managers and high-ranking people. Therefore, their self-management skills after a challenging time are useful for their study at university or college.
To sum up, I believe that either travelling or working in the gap year can bring some benefits to the young generation. Travelling can help people clarify themselves, and working can help them learn how to manage their life.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (5 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-05-21 Alex.X.Hg@5141 81 view
2020-05-21 Alex.X.Hg@5141 82 view
2020-05-21 Alex.X.Hg@5141 77 view
Essays by user Alex.X.Hg@5141 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in my opinion, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10989010989 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84900220943 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479853479853 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.1909125414 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.1875 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0625 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191715934467 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758286747212 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555952164561 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135078028135 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511159919329 0.056905535591 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.