All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. Do you agree or disagree?
In this modern era, everyone prefers to travel in their personal vehicles. So burning of fossil fuels lead to environmental pollution and other issues. Whether all cars that use fossil fuels should be banned and replace them with electric cars or not is a debated topic. I strongly agree with this statement on the account of the following reasons.
To begin with, the burning of fossil fuels leads to environmental pollution. Moreover, usage of renewable fuels such as petroleum leads to an increase in global temperature which further causes to global warming & ozone layer depletion. Therefore,replacing with electric cars is a good solution to reduce environmental pollution. Furthermore, electric cars are eco -friendly. For instance, nowadays when a person wants to go to a nearby shop , then he prefers to go there by using his private vehicle rather than walking.
In addition to this, overconsumption of fossil fuels will lead to scarcity of non-renewable fuels for future humankind’s. Fossil fuels are currently used as the primary energy sources for the world. There are mainly 2 different types such as renewable& non-renewable fuels .The fuels which are used in cars are patrols & diesels which belongs to non-renewable ones. It takes a long period of time to replace & it comes from carbon-based organic matter. Moreover, It takes more million periods to produced on earth and it is vital for future generations .For example, in this modern world, people are using more fossil fuels will cause trouble for the upcoming population. They may face scarcity of fuels to sustain their living on earth mainly for private vehicle transportation.
To conclude, although all cars that burn fossil fuels should be prohibited and replaces with electric cars due to above-mentioned reasons. The banning of fossil cars help us to reduce major environmental problem such as pollution and saving the non-renewable fossil fuels for upbringing mankind’s.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , replacing
...rming & ozone layer depletion. Therefore,replacing with electric cars is a good solution t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 443, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...en a person wants to go to a nearby shop , then he prefers to go there by using hi...
^^
Line 13, column 278, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s such as renewable& non-renewable fuels .The fuels which are used in cars are pat...
^^
Line 13, column 280, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...such as renewable& non-renewable fuels .The fuels which are used in cars are patrol...
^^^
Line 13, column 388, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... to non-renewable ones. It takes a long period of time to replace & it comes from carbon-based...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 483, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...organic matter. Moreover, It takes more million periods to produced on earth and it is ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 558, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...h and it is vital for future generations .For example, in this modern world, peopl...
^^
Line 13, column 560, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...and it is vital for future generations .For example, in this modern world, people a...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43225806452 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11207121072 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0728399915 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0588235294 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2352941176 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359311164918 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13199290159 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155093455813 0.0667982634062 232% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278308194567 0.151304729494 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142343900158 0.056905535591 250% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.