All education, primary, secondary, and further education, should be free to all people and paid for by the government. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Education plays an indispensable role in building a successful of a person. Authorities should pay all education student fees and should be free to all the individuals. In my perspective, the government would be only paid fees for needy people not for rich people.
It is obvious that education is the most powerful weapon which we can change the world. The main point is that as the government of every nation provide free higher education for poor people in their country, then it would be very beneficial for them because they can easily enhance their knowledge of distinctive subjects which pupils can get chance to do more better in their career. For instance, a recent Cambridge study revealed that if the scholars who get decent grades in their field, then this may help to free the expenses of their education fees a give more scholarships and the opportunities to them which they can easily live a better lifestyle.
Apart from this, since the authorities pay fees for poverty-stricken people, then school and university could also offer several subjects and the events for students which they can start to increase their insight. As a consequence, the development of every nation would escalate around the globe. For example, even if law enforcement agencies pay educational fees for needy people, it would not only be superior for poor ones, but this may help a country to increase its name and fame all around the world, therefore, the majority of people can easily pay their other expenses instead of educational fees and the gap between the rich and poor people would be equal in future.
To sum up, although it is a decent way to pay the whole fees by the authorities, poor people can get a chance to do higher education in their life, yet they should not pay educational fees for the wealthy people owing to which, they already have much money to pay their own education fees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-22 | Taeyeon Kim | 84 | view |
- Some people think that non academic subjects eg physical education and cookery should be removed from the syllabus so that children can concentrate wholly on academic subjects 76
- News editor what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers What factors do you think influence these decisions Do we become used to bad news Would it be better if more good news was reported 84
- The graphs below shows four categories of cities fruits ant the top three countries to which these were exported in 2012. 78
- Many people believe that family has greater impact on children life? do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- Young people prefer listening to music rather than listening to the news on the radio Is this positive or a negative trend provide reasons and examples for your opinion 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...jects which pupils can get chance to do more better in their career. For instance, a recent...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 666, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...the rich and poor people would be equal in future. To sum up, although it is a decent ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, therefore, apart from, for example, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84049079755 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65537886614 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481595092025 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 108.597421701 49.4020404114 220% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 157.8 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.6 20.7667163134 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167973813785 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827622930127 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789239086519 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13042115789 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683023019151 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.