The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.
The chart illustrates rank number 1 to 10 of countries which produced and consumed the electricity in 2014. In order, those top ten nations are China, United States, Russia, Japan, India, Canada, France, Brazil, Germany, and Korea.
The electricity production in China as the first place reached 5.398 billion KWH then it is followed by the slightly under amount of consumption. The similar pattern of under 100 billion KWH gap between the produced and the consumed electricity among these nations were applied for Russia, Japan, Brazil, and Korea during this period.
On the other hand, some other countries such as United States, India, Canada, and France showed significant different amount between how much they produced and used electricity for over 100 billion KWH.
Meanwhile, the usage of electricity in Germany was 582,5 billion KWH. Whereas, the production was only 526.6 billion KWH which means that Germany still had lack of electricity production.
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. 73
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case ? what can be done about this problem? 61
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems 69
- The bar chart below show the percentage of Australian men and women in different age group who did regular physical activity in 2010 89
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 71, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...icity in Germany was 582,5 billion KWH. Whereas, the production was only 526.6 billion ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, still, then, whereas, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 41.998997996 45% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 818.0 1615.20841683 51% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 152.0 315.596192385 48% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38157894737 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 4.20363070211 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55219068357 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 176.041082164 54% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 506.74238477 47% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0960010456 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.857142857 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216133672013 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.099392342814 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504340571083 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126505402363 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482278184824 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 78.4519038076 43% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.