The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000, 2005 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares four different countries in terms of the proportion of young people entering higher education in three years, 2000, 2005 and 2010.
Overall, of the three countries, country D had the highest percentage of young people enrolling in higher education in all three years, while participation levels in country B were lowest. In addition, countries A and D experienced the greatest increase in young people’s participation in higher education.
Looking first at countries A and D, in 2000, 60% of young people in country D entered university education, while the figure for country A was much lower, at only about 38%. A decade later, these figures rose significantly to 80% and around 59%, respectively.
Turning to the two remaining nations, we can see that, in country C,young people’s university participation rose slightly by 2%, from 50% in 2000 to 52% in 2010. The figure for country B, by contrast, remained at 40% over the period shown, despite a small drop of 2%, down to 38% in 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-22 | ngoctham4344 | 56 | view |
| 2020-07-22 | ngoctham4344 | 56 | view |
| 2020-07-22 | ngoctham4344 | 56 | view |
- Attending a live performance for example a play concert or sporting event is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In many cities there is little control on the design and construction of new homes and office buildings and people can build houses in their own style What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a situation 78
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The bar graphs show the distribution of employment among agriculture manufacturing industry and services in 3 countries in 1980 and 2020 87
- The diagram below shows one way of manufacturing ceramic pots Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 68, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , young
...g nations, we can see that, in country C,young people’s university participation rose ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 3.0 24.0651302605 12% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 1615.20841683 53% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 170.0 315.596192385 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03529411765 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 4.20363070211 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92231599863 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 176.041082164 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 506.74238477 47% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0559204614 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.285714286 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200114486533 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10668454506 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916554967125 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150511805433 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0948881869331 0.056905535591 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 50.2224549098 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 78.4519038076 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.