The best way to reduce youth crimes is to educate their parents with parental skills. To what extent you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that providing parents with necessary parental techniques is the most effective way to cope with the increasing rate of juvenile delinquency. Personally, I disagree with this belief because as well as parents, schools also play a key role in dealing with this problem.
Words and actions of adults are more likely to have great impacts on the characteristic of children as they tend to unconsciously imitate their parents. In other words, parents are the role models for their kids through their behavior towards their children and others. Therefore, bad upbringing can exert bad implications on a child’s livelihood, increasing the chance of their involvement in juvenile offenses. For example, kids who grew up in a family full of bitter arguments or even violence tend to act violently with their friends or bully other classmates. Clearly, parents play a significant role in children’s behavioral development, which means that parenting skills are of great importance.
Nonetheless, I am of the opinion that the role of schools and other educational institutions in the development of children is more crucial. It is obvious that when kids reach school age, they spend more time at school than at home. Accordingly, schools can deter children from embarking on a life of crime by making their students spend their free time attending beneficial programs such as communication skills courses, art classes, and sports clubs. As a result, children may not have time to interact with bad guys or participate in negative activities. Take my cousin, who is a big and aggressive boy, as an example; he used to bully his classmates as his favorite hobby. However, after joining a karate club, he is no more violent and he spends all his free time practicing karate with a dream of becoming a karate master.
In conclusion, the best way to reduce youth crimes is the joint efforts from families and schools to educate children to become good persons.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-08-06 | Duong Linh | 84 | view |
2019-08-06 | Duong Linh | 67 | view |
2019-07-29 | Duong Linh | 61 | view |
2019-05-06 | dkklinkkk | 56 | view |
2019-05-06 | dkklinkkk | 67 | view |
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 73
- The world is experiencing a dramatic increase in population, which is causing problems not only for poor, undeveloped countries, but also for industrialised and developed nations. Describe some of the problems that overpopulation causes, and suggest at le 84
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 63
- The chart below gives information about Southeland's main exports in 2005, now, and future projections for 2025. 84
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing.Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15789473684 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93542863487 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3682634481 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 119.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236916534402 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779246000948 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072006141946 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159933922163 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632822953122 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.