The best way to solve traffic congestion is to provide free public
transport 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Do you agree or disagree?
That the solutions should be implemented to decrease traffic jam has controversial. It is believed that the most effective measure to tackle this problem is to supply free public vehicle all the time. I partly agree with view because this method has pros and cons.
To begin with, it is undeniable that offering free public transport bring some advantages. First and foremost, this solution will decrease the number of vehicles on the road. Due to the fact that public transport such as buses or trains have more seats than private vehicles, the total of motorbikes or private cars which are the primary reason of traffic jam will decline significantly. Moreover, that government offer public means residents can save the huge amount of money for other hobbies. For example, they can spend more money on purchasing some interesting books or solving the personal problems instead of spending them for fuels, fare or maintenance of private vehicle.
Nevertheless, providing free public transport in 24 hours every day has some negative impacts on the national economy. The government will face with the financial problems because of limited budget. For instance, when the government spend much money on public transport, it is clearly seen that the shortage of fund for other fields like education, health or technical will occur. It is important to balance the budget for development of country. Besides, traffic congestion is caused not only by the vast number of private vehicles but also the road systems. In addition, in emergency circumstances, people still chose the private vehicles because of being convenient.
In conclusion, although there are some benefits of this measure, I assume that providing free public transport all the days and all the hours is not the best solution to reduce traffic congestion. In the long term, investments on facilities and road systems should be carried out along to offering public transport.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-02-25 | mr.cuong95 | 74 | view |
- Online education is becoming more and more popular. Some people claim that e-learning has so many benefit that it will replace face - to - face education. Others say that traditional education is irreplaceable. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 96
- 1.Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise. Other think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both of views and give your opinion. 56
- The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and repairing the main features and make comparisons 72
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- 1.The graph and chart give information and forecast about the vehicle and CO2 emission in England and Wales between 2000 and 2020 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 198, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... solution to reduce traffic congestion. In the long term, investments on facilitie...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23076923077 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71891613165 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567307692308 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1160221615 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9375 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130213384756 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434013592908 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678835448895 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0882791101774 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043497271585 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.