The best way to solve the world’s environmental problem is to increase the cost of fuel. Do you agree or disagree?
It is thought that governments can avert the environmental issues that put our world in jeopardy just by increasing the cost of fuel. However, I think that it is just one of the most significant policy and we need more.
To commence with, one evident explanation of why decreasing the consumption of fossil fuel is not the best option is somewhat related to policies and legislations of authorities. In other words, office-bearers not only prevent dwellers from utilizing fossil fuel but also foster to plant more trees, to recycle, to utilize energy-efficient items, to limit using plastic bags which act as a foremost catalyst in damaging the environment and so forth. In addition, banning deforestations plays a significant role in this serious matter by virtue of the importance of trees which can suck emissions and release oxygen into the atmosphere.
Another underlying factor to take under advisement is the efforts as well as the cooperation between citizens and office-holders. It is indispensable to understand that obeying environmental laws is necessary. For example, in case farmers clear forests to make way for farming or other their own purposes, regardless of the regulations, protecting the environment will never be successfully mitigated. Moreover, human activities in daily life also make huge contributions to tackle this global matter. Therefore, it is substantial to teach and guide youngsters, the next generation, do tangible activities in order to control environmental disasters, violent storms, prolonged droughts, and other extreme weather conditions.
In conclusion, although increasing the cost of fuel can control the environmental problem, I totally opine that the other two aforementioned elements are more crucial to go forward.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-30 | tieuquynh | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-30 | tieuquynh | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-17 | Lunar Tran | 84 | view |
| 2022-04-21 | Yamin_j | 61 | view |
| 2020-05-25 | Hương Giang | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000 92
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe compared to the EU average in 2009 and 2010 51
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 100
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played by boys and girls in new zealand in 2002 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52573529412 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31657384798 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654411764706 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1172492798 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.636363636 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9090909091 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184688092295 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611417960002 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756689098035 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116844220818 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606761704509 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52573529412 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31657384798 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654411764706 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1172492798 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.636363636 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9090909091 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184688092295 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611417960002 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756689098035 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116844220818 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606761704509 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.