The best way to solve world’s environmental problems is increase the cost of fuel.
Do you agree or disagree and give your own opinion?
It is argued that the most effective solution to the environmental issues around the world is to lift the price of fuel. I can only partly agree with this view.
It is obvious that increasing the cost of fuel can have a direct impact on consumers’ and industries’ usage of fuel and therefore generating positive results for the environment. From a consumer perspective, the motive to drive or using fuel-driven engines in households would be weakened when the price tag of fuel is less affordable. As a consequence, they will be encouraged to search for alternative types of energy, most of which available is significantly less detrimental to the environment than the fuel itself. The same pattern of behaviors would be seen in most industries since companies want to control the cost of production and profits. In energy production spheres, changing consumer preferences for energy will lead energy manufacturers to adjust themselves to meet consumers’ need, leaving finding and producing greener form of energy a new trend.
However, intervention to the cost of fuel would be insufficient to tackle such a global issue as environmental degradation. The government should enact tougher rules and regulations with regard to the environment. Industries, especially heavy carbon dioxide polluters, needs to be brought under close supervision and imposed carbon dioxide quotas. By doing this, CO2 will be significantly reduced and a cleaner and safer environment on Earth will be guaranteed. Moreover, environmental protection campaigns should be encouraged and given adequate publicity to raise global public awareness of environmental preservation.
In conclusion, making adjust to the price of fuel is a sensible policy to alter public’s attitudes and behaviors in fuel consumption. However, more actions need to be done to successfully deal with the problem of environmental destruction worldwide.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-17 | Lunar Tran | 84 | view |
| 2020-05-21 | Inpu Nguyen | 73 | view |
| 2020-03-20 | moonlucas | 84 | view |
| 2020-03-10 | NigarM | 64 | view |
| 2020-02-16 | hoakim | 89 | view |
- Worldwide mobile phone sales in 2005 2006 share of market 83
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world what are the reasons and how can people learn more about the natural world 82
- Some people think that being born to a poor country is a bad luck while others believe that it only helps fuel one s aspiration to succeed Discuss both view and give your opinion 89
- The widespread use of the internet gives people more freedom to work and study at home instead of going to work or college Do you think its advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The best way to reduce youth crimes is to teach their parents parental skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50680272109 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29572881239 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578231292517 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8303790593 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.642857143 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78571428571 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160357803738 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599480559141 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445240188499 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104728738232 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0155262521121 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.