Better for companies to make long last products, others think that it is the most important thing is cheap prices. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
While some individuals believe the quality of products is the best for companies, others say low prices are better. There are arguments on both sides of this very topical debate, and I will discuss then now.
There are several reasons why companies should save quality of their output. Firstly, lots of clients search a good product, that serve for a long term and indestructible during use. When people try to buy new product they check it for durability and then pay for that. Secondly, companies can make big profit from good quality and high price product. This can be help to stuff and provider for row-materials. Finally, last-long products could make their own customers and never lost them. Although, advertisement is the best way to sold products, good items do not need any suggestion.
On the other hand, some people believe that companies should focus on cheap prices. They highlight the low prices on the market are affordable and likely for everyone even they rich or poor. For example, customers sometime compare prices and choose the cheapest one. They also say that, the product tax are proportional for its price, low price means low tax. While governments require taxes for every output companies should lower the price, if they want to avoid big amount of tax. Furthermore, low priced companies can make deal with partners and make huge profits in this way.
In conclusion, there are convincing arguments both for and against better for companies is good quality or cheap price, but I believe that both last-long and cheaper products can make lots of patronages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-22 | farhodyusupov | 53 | view |
| 2021-03-22 | farhodyusupov | 56 | view |
| 2021-03-22 | farhodyusupov | 56 | view |
- The chart below gives information about southland s main exports in 2000 20 and future projections for 2025 20 for test purposes use and refer to the current year 61
- The diagrams below show the stages in the development of simple cooking equipment 56
- The chart below show the number of working hoirs per week in industrial sector in four European countries in 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons with relevant 56
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in differnt countries in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisos where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ompanies is good quality or cheap price, but I believe that both last-long and ch...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 41.998997996 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98490566038 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52057393996 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584905660377 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6903351789 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5625 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5625 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3125 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331417224578 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111159114617 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780531478542 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234852368262 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713034159941 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.