Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction.
Do you agree or disagree?
Provide relevant examples if necessary.
It is often argued that it is more advantageous to choose a job with high wage, even if it doesn't appeal to you at all. I completely disagree with this opinion and think that job satisfaction is much more important than salary.
First of all, I believe that job satisfaction gives people a sense of fulfillment that no money can guarantee. Even if someone is earning a high salary, but feels tensed and compromises with his conscience, this person won’t enjoy his life. While pursuing one’s interests will always bring pleasure and feeling of satisfaction. For example, a lot of famous researchers made their career choices not because of appealing wages, but because they were passionate about science. That’s why it’s more important to choose the kind of work that makes you happy than to look only at a high salary.
Secondly, doing what you like keeps you motivated and therefore leads to a career growth. In other words, there is a strong relation between job satisfaction and productivity. People who love their jobs can easily excel in their fields of work and achieve better results than those, who put salary on the first place. For instance, Henry Miller decided to leave his everyday job despite a good wage and ventured to become a writer. And after enduring years of ups and downs he became one of the most famous and well-paid authors of the twentieth century. Thus, advantages of jobs that keep you satisfied outweigh the drawback of a low salary in a long-term perspective.
To conclude, I strongly believe that job satisfaction is more beneficial than high salary because it makes people happy and motivated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-27 | Asif Sharief | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | ricky1435646 | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | Lincoln | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-04 | r_student4030 | 61 | view |
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationship people make?Has this become a positive or negative development. 67
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 61
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying fulltime or part-time.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where rele 67
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
- In the modern world it is possible to shop,work, and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face-to-face contact with each others. Is this a positive or negative development? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...choose a job with high wage, even if it doesnt appeal to you at all. I completely disa...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, kind of, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9963898917 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73082203602 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595667870036 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 18.371589646 49.4020404114 37% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.8571428571 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240706526341 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804678588191 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713794301186 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159046742533 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566484078693 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.