In recent times, expenditure on preservation of animals and their habitats is experiencing a growing popularity by both government and its citizens. While some people believe that it is for the best of the environment, others argue that this money should be invested to dispel poverty and enhance medical services. In my opinion, it is acceptable to allocate money for protecting wildlife; however, it should not be at the expense of stopping funds to other crucial sectors.
To begin with, it is extremely essential to invest money on saving animals and their dwelling places. This is because, they are an indispensable part of the ecosystem, which ensures the human existence into this world to a great extent. In other words, humans and animals are inter-dependent on each other in order to maintain balance within the ecosystem. If we do not save budget for keeping animals and their habitats safe, then this balance will get disrupted, which would eventually lead to extinction of both humans and animals. Another point to consider is that animals not only provide us with food but also other useful products such as medicines, luxurious bags. For instance, a recent study published by a renowned university reported that scientists are close to finding the cure of various forms of cancer from a species of shark. Therefore, cutting off the funds to conserve animals would take a heavy toll on human lives.
Nevertheless, despite having reasons to subsidize animal protection, I don’t think government should spend its entire finances on this alone. This is because, majority of the countries are inlaid with lots of alarming problems. One of the most obvious challenges is poverty. According to a united nation’s report, more than half of the world’s population is living below the poverty line. This means that they have either no access or limited access to food, water, shelter or clothing. If government had decided to fund animal protection programs only, then countless number of people would have died out of poverty and starvation. Moreover, without strengthening the health care services, people will not be able to expect a disease-free lifespan. Consequently, governments need to reserve money for tackling these problems as well.
In conclusion, while it is true that government needs to keep funding to save the animal kingdom for maintaining the biodiversity, it can neither ignore the problems that are likely to arise from lacking of investment to eradicate poverty and improving medical health care services. In my view, governments and individuals need to find out a balance to expense on these two categories.
- The performance of staff can have a significant impact on the success of a company What can companies do to increase staff productivity 93
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- With increase population and even growing urban centers many countries are losing their natural beauty spots What benefits are there to protect places of natural beauty How can this be solved 95
- It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife while there are other problems that are more important Do you agree or disagree 89
- The government should reduce the amount of money spent on local environmental problems and instead increase funding into urgent and more threatening issues such as global warming To what extent do you agree 92
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in my view, in other words, it is true, to begin with, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2226.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 427.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2131147541 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84210346703 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578454332553 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 701.1 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7414652058 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.3 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.35 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.05 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281371748843 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742731688838 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462237558833 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164953475827 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043866018452 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in my view, in other words, it is true, to begin with, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2226.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 427.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2131147541 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84210346703 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578454332553 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 701.1 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7414652058 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.3 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.35 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.05 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281371748843 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742731688838 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462237558833 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164953475827 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043866018452 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.