There is no doubt that world environment is going through a lot of crisis. Although some people believe that global warming is mainly responsible for environmental problems, others think that deforestation is the main culprit. In my opinion, since deforestation gives rise to global warming, it has more contribution in disrupting the ecological balance.
On the one hand, global warming is causing a devastating effect on the environment. This is because factories and vehicles burn fossil fuels in order to operate, which result in emission of toxic green-house gases that harm the environment. In other words, these hazardous gases deplete the ozone layer that protects the earth’s atmosphere from harmful radiation. Needless to say, these pernicious radiations cause not only disease to humans but also increase the temperature of the planet. That’s why, the glacier in the polar region is starting to melt, which, in turn, will lead to submergence or disappearance of continents. However, the amount of these detrimental gases is kept in check by trees because they usually absorb these gases. Therefore, it is quite evident that deforestation breeds global warming.
On the other hand, some people think that deforestation is the main pressing problem that needs to be addressed first and I completely agree with that. This is because trees keep human and wildlife alive by releasing oxygen and absorbing carbon dioxide, the latter of which is mainly responsible for global warming. Indiscriminate cutting down of trees lead to accumulation of gases that initiates the vicious cycle of environmental degradation. For instance, a recent article in Times magazine reported that 30% of the wildlife is going to be extinct in the next fifty years due to reckless chopping down of trees. Moreover, deforestation makes the land barren because of which scarcity of food has already started to prevail in both developed and developing nation. Thus, deforestation is aggravating the existing poverty and unemployment.
To conclude, while people may vary in their opinion, I think that deforestation is destroying the environment more than any other thing, as well as contributing to the emergence of global warning and other issues.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, i think, no doubt, as well as, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.48453608247 227% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 4.92783505155 41% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 3.03092783505 528% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 32.9175257732 79% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 26.3917525773 189% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 3.85567010309 545% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1894.0 937.175257732 202% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 351.0 206.0 170% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39601139601 4.54256449028 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 3.78020617076 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01018420014 2.54303337028 118% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 127.690721649 160% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581196581197 0.622605031667 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.0 290.88556701 201% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.41237113402 120% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.13402061856 88% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.83505154639 218% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 1.44329896907 485% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6804123711 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.4849450749 44.8134815571 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.411764706 76.5299724578 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6470588235 16.8248392259 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1764705882 4.34317383033 234% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.49484536082 468% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267883059075 0.216113520407 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758296828236 0.0766984524023 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682817747436 0.0603063233224 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167208813079 0.12726935374 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549257170639 0.0580467560999 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 8.37731958763 171% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 70.7449484536 60% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 7.45979381443 165% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 8.71597938144 161% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 7.59969072165 125% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 41.2886597938 262% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 8.62886597938 104% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.