Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now one big traffic jam How true do you think this statement is What measures can governments take to discourage people fro using their cars

In this rapid moving and scientific era, technological advancements have enthralled the entire globe. Considerably, car ownership has displayed unprecedented growth over the past three decades. This has consequently led to the heavy congestion of traffic jams. According to my perspective, governments can definitely initiate some suggestive measures to control this menace.

Commencing the discussion, the purchase for cars has dramatically shown a tremendous development over the past few years. There are numerous reasons that individuals’ express immense enthusiasm concerning the new cars launched in the market. It makes companies produce new cars to meet the demands of the customers. Consequently, it creates more traffic congestion leading to the dense traffic jams on the roads. Moreover, administrations least bother about building suitable parking lots that further adds to the traffic problems. Apart from this, affluent families demonstrate remarkable passion towards purchasing newly launched latest cars.

Further reinforcing my perspective, governments can take some stringent measure in refraining the traffic chaos. Firstly, concerned administration should emphasis on building adequate parking lots to reduce the traffic jam pandemonium. Besides, government must encourage the commuters to utilize more affordable public transportation like buses and metro trains. Secondly, governments need to evaluate the necessity of production of cars. They should work in collaboration with the car manufacturing companies in order to monitor the surplus production of vehicles that causes traffic problems.

To recapitulate, concerned authorities should take strict measures to control the extravagant production of cars in order to control the heavy traffic pandemonium in the country. Apart from this, common public should refrain from purchasing more cars than actually required.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'administrations the least'.
Suggestion: administrations the least
...se traffic jams on the roads. Moreover, administrations least bother about building suitable parking ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 624, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'launched the latest'.
Suggestion: launched the latest
...rkable passion towards purchasing newly launched latest cars. Further reinforcing my perspe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...chasing newly launched latest cars. Further reinforcing my perspective, governments...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 596, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... vehicles that causes traffic problems. To recapitulate, concerned authorities s...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...asing more cars than actually required.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, consequently, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, apart from

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 13.1623246493 8% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.13857677903 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19000001561 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614232209738 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4006541482 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.4117647059 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7058823529 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94117647059 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229916182451 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706942030869 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373279197843 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143599155285 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288386194734 0.056905535591 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.04 12.4159519038 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.24 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.