Children are the mold for a society, because of this reason some this is a controversial topic that
whether there should be formal training and guidelines for the parents so that they can take care of their children in a perfect manner.
Even though parents play a vital role in the upbringing of the children but there should not any compulsion to attend the formal course for the same,
In this essay, I will express my views in the details.
There are several factors that must be considered before forcing the parents to a training programme. Firstly, Nowadays, most of the parents are working and it would be almost impossible for them to attend any sort of programme which will teach them how to become perfect parents.
Secondly, becoming superior parents is not a theoretical concept, one can only understand by his or her experience. Above all of this, every child needs a different way to treat. So implementing the rules cannot be an effective way to improve children mindset.
On the other side, it would be extremally difficult for the government to introduce these type of special course, because it would need an enormously high budget and special infrastructure plus awareness.
Even though there is no guarantee that by implementing the course would give cent percent result. Thus, it would not be a proper solution to make parents perfect.
To conclude, It is fact that children are the future if a society, but enforcing an educational course for the parents should not be compulsary.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 117, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a perfect manner" with adverb for "perfect"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...at they can take care of their children in a perfect manner. Even though parents play a vital role...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 206, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... special infrastructure plus awareness. Even though there is no guarantee that by implement...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1264.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9568627451 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73160831155 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560784313725 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0997196229 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.909090909 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.38176352705 205% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171199201888 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651425118502 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581954874003 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.079238199402 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059091949715 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.