This essay indicates the the fluctuations in the usage of electrical appliances, being composed of washing machine, refrigerator and vaccum cleaner as well as time spending for housework per week of households in one nation from 1920 to 2019.
On the one hand, it can be seen that electrical appliances were more and more popular to the households by the surge of all proportions in general. Refrigerator was the appliance witnessed the most significant changes in the given years, from nearly not being used by 1920 to the extreme percentage of 100 per cent in 2000, then kept maintaining this data to 2019. Besides, vaccum cleaner had a steady rise of 20 per cent each year in the period of 1920-1980. After that, the figures had been tapered of 10 per cent for 1980-2000 and plateaued at 100 per cent for the following years. Meanwhile, from the highest beginning of 40 per cent, washing machine increased to 70 per cent in 1960 and demised a little until it climbed back gradually in 1980 and just reached above 70 per cent in the last year shown.
On the flip side, the numbers of hours for doing chores was in the opposite tendency. Starting from 50 hours per week and falling to merely 10 hours in 2019.
In conclusion, these two graphs point out the more common ownenership of electrical appliances and the downwards of hours for housework in the later years.
- In the past most families ate together in the evening and the food was almost always cooked at home Nowadays however many families rarely eat together every day and often the food is bought outside the house or supplied by catering What are the reaso 89
- More and more fathers are taking a break from their careers so that they can stay home and take care of their children while their wives work This is better for the family than having both parents work full time To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think that the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- New technologies and ways of buying and selling are transforming the lives of consumers To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
This essay indicates the the fluctuations in the usage of electrical...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
This essay indicates the the fluctuations in the usage of electrical...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...achine, refrigerator and vaccum cleaner as well as time spending for housework per...
^^
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e, the numbers of hours for doing chores was in the opposite tendency. Starting f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, then, well, while, in conclusion, in general, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1131.0 1615.20841683 70% => OK
No of words: 240.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7125 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63277618051 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554166666667 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 506.74238477 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.60771543086 81% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.7973945508 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.666666667 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150142654325 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691452719272 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606040613208 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104060315696 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532858005466 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.