The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and the amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019

The given line graphs illustrate how many people have had three different electrical equipments and how much time invested in the housework each week from 1920 to 2019.
Overall, all three equipment noticed steady rise according to the time where Refrigerator have tremendous change over the time as altering the trend at the end with all time high condition.
In the second graph, there was a minimal decline over the given time period in hours of housework per week.
From the firtst graph it is clear that in 1920 no one have Refrigerator but rapidly start purchasing and within next 60 years it was reached at 100%, after that it was unchanged till 2019. The linear rise was observed in the case of Vacuum cleaner which stated with 30% in 1920 and ending with 100% in 200 and 2019. The trend of Washing machine was flctuated with steady rise; where, beginning was with 40% and till 1960 it was grow steadily with 70% where Vacuume cleaner surpassed it. Following that, with the bottom of above 60% in 1980, it was started rising again till the the end and finished at minimum level at last by nearly 72%.
In the another graph, 50 hours of time was spent on the housework in 1920. Next to that, gradual downfall in the work up to the 20 hours in 1960. Then after due to the electronic gadgets, weekly working time was decreased consistently and ended with only 10 hours a week in 2019.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 428, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'grown'.
Suggestion: grown
...nning was with 40% and till 1960 it was grow steadily with 70% where Vacuume cleaner...
^^^^
Line 4, column 575, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... 1980, it was started rising again till the the end and finished at minimum level at la...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 575, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... 1980, it was started rising again till the the end and finished at minimum level at la...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1146.0 1615.20841683 71% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.584 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27157742549 2.80592935109 81% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 506.74238477 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.60771543086 81% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.2824417882 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.6 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.1 7.06120827912 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134699165912 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677774364916 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586412745322 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0914780283329 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316168770031 0.056905535591 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 50.2224549098 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 78.4519038076 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.