The chat below show the figures for imprisonment in live countries between 1930 and 1980 write are port for a university lecture describing the information show below

Essay topics:

The chat below show the figures for imprisonment in live countries between 1930 and 1980 write are port for a university lecture describing the information show below

The chat below show the figures for imprisonment in live countries between 1930 and 1980 write are port for a university lecture describing the information show below. Canada ia a country with high crime rates compared to other countries, while great britain every Ten years has always seen an in crease seen from the imprisonment diagram.
In 1930-1950 criminal level in 5 countries experienced ups and downs, seen from the graph of figures of imprisonment in a period of 30 years the highest data in the United States in 1940 namely 124 and the lowest data in the great Britain in 1930 and 1940 obtained figures the same 30 while Canada is the country with the highest crime rate because for the first 30 years the average data obtained is above 100.
Then in 1960-1980 within 30 years the United States state had the highest crime average data compared to the other 4 countries while Canada was the second country with the highest crime rate after the United States because it was explained in the figure of imprisonment to get the amount of data in the last 30 years it was 275 while the United States was 345 so the United States was a dangerous country.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-01-04 Ferry Yuda prasetyo 56 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The chat below show the figures for impr...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se seen from the imprisonment diagram. In 1930-1950 criminal level in 5 countri...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he average data obtained is above 100. Then in 1960-1980 within 30 years the Un...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, so, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 2.0 24.0651302605 8% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 958.0 1615.20841683 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 206.0 315.596192385 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65048543689 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39585606994 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 176.041082164 54% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461165048544 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 290.7 506.74238477 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 16.0721442886 25% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 51.0 20.2975951904 251% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 119.527193559 49.4020404114 242% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 239.5 106.682146367 224% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 51.5 20.7667163134 248% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302976654656 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.301314054299 0.084324248473 357% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.404478969878 0.0667982634062 606% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260333969114 0.151304729494 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.253210663939 0.056905535591 445% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 26.2 13.0946893788 200% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.8 11.3001002004 184% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.58 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 78.4519038076 34% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 22.4 10.1190380762 221% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.