Children’s education is expensive. In some countries, the government pay some or all of cost. Do you agree that it brings more advantages than disadvantages ?
Parents have to pay the high cost of their children education. In several countries, the Administration is spending part of money or all to educating them. Despite some obvious disadvantages of this, I believe that these are outweighed by the advantages.
On the one hand, there are number of major drawbacks when government pay money for children education. The first drawback is adolescents will not focus on studying. They can suppose this money is of government not thier parents. For example, instead of going to school, they will play games, even they go further into social evils. Another negative effect is only the remission of public schools, as for private schools, don’t have definition about it. Private schools are established by organization or individual, so that they must be profitable. This brings unfairness for children.
On the other hand, I believe that the benefits are more significant than such disadvantage. Firstly, families are ease the cost burden. Not only do parents pay tuition, but also they have to disburse for house hold expenses such as: food, residence, contribution, etc. Secondly, juveniles live in poor or low income families have opportunity of going to school, for instance, some ethnic minority region, their parents don’t stable jobs, they have to toil and moil and still short of money to children learning. Besides, they are added motivation in order to teach and bring their offspring go to school. Finally, free literacy means invest to future of younger generation. When they go to school, they don’t have afford to pay, by the time they will have finished studying, they will look for jobs, earn money and then they support schooling.
In conclusion, I would argue that the appearance of policy brings more benefits than drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Parents have to pay the high cost of the...
^^
Line 3, column 715, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'afforded'.
Suggestion: afforded
...When they go to school, they don’t have afford to pay, by the time they will have fini...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, then, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16838487973 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7277518453 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584192439863 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.2614542913 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5555555556 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1666666667 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.22222222222 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17183024617 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595557811614 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485586597555 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127449504089 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565767592423 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.