Children should always follow their parents' advice.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
The significance of their own circle of relatives' position in a kid's existence is apparent for all and sundry so a few human beings assume that youngsters need to observe their dad and mom's recommendation. However, others declare that it isn't continually proper. I assume the subsequent recommendation from youngsters withinside the own circle of relatives relies upon their a while and conformities.
At the primary a while of childhood, youngsters do not know the distinction between proper and wrong, for example, they do not know that fireplace side is risky or how rude behavior influences others. As a sensible instance, these days the extra development in telecommunication technology like social media, the extra care about a kid's existence is undeniable. Parents typically are aware of the damaging outcomes of infinite use of those technologies however youngsters don’t. Therefore, for developing personality, youngsters want a person who can speak to them in a pleasant manner and deliver a few pieces of advice.
On different hand as they extra turn into mature, they have got extra obligation and emerge as mature as well. Because of feeling free, unbiased and autonomous, they need to make their own decisions. In this situation, dad and mom supporting as an adviser on morals and protection may be very useful. Young human beings do not need all and sundry to manipulate them and instruct them a way to live, How to act and, etc. They are grown up and they could determine for themselves, however what makes advice extra ideal is the manner dad and mom behave with their youngsters, like a chairman or like a friend.
In conclusion, I partly agree and for my part dad and mom' advices assist youngsters to be extra cautious and careful in childhood, after they develop up it's time to go away from anything they need.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 65, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'kids'' or 'kid's'?
Suggestion: kids'; kid's
...r own circle of relatives position in a kids existence is apparent for all and sundr...
^^^^
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...dation. However, others declare that it isnt continually proper. I assume the subseq...
^^^^
Line 1, column 370, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...the own circle of relatives relies upon their a while and conformities. At the prim...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 333, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'kids'' or 'kid's'?
Suggestion: kids'; kid's
...ke social media, the extra care about a kids existence is undeniable. Parents typica...
^^^^
Line 2, column 566, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a pleasant manner" with adverb for "pleasant"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ers want a person who can speak to them in a pleasant manner and deliver a few pieces of advice. On...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98697068404 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94661012356 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583061889251 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4298340574 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.769230769 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0996642199753 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332751785741 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0282384831332 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0577968687975 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0189622707229 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.