Compare and contrast about reading paper books and ebooks

In modern society, we have more exigency for information collection and we have many ways to get information.Paper books and ebooks are both methods of acquiring knowledge that have numerous similarities and distinctions. Despite their obvious differences, digital versions and physical books are identical in many aspects. First, an ebook uses many of the same conventions as a traditional book. For example, they all have the cover, title page, copyright page, table of contents, chapters, paragraphs, and so on. Second, readers use paper books and e-readers for the same purposes: to study, relax, work, and absorb vital knowledge for everyday life. At the same time, these two share several qualities in uncommon. eBooks are simpler and faster to read, so users are more prone to skim the contents. Therefore, the ebook-readers are a poorer understanding of the information. However, physical books are superior for comprehension. They make the readers feel comfortable and reach the level of comprehension. They make the readers feel comfortable and reach the level of comprehension desired. Another point of comparison is the price. The cost of a paper book is purposefully greater than that of an e-book. Finally, there are variations between paper books and e-books that may be advantageous or disadvantageous to those who read them. Readers have the option to read just one of them or both sources.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Paper
...nd we have many ways to get information.Paper books and ebooks are both methods of ac...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 719, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: EBooks
...wo share several qualities in uncommon. eBooks are simpler and faster to read, so user...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1184.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 224.0 315.596192385 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28571428571 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0978926346 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598214285714 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.9617918103 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.9333333333 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9333333333 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53333333333 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237570480177 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805484174053 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760581140981 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237570480177 0.151304729494 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.81 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.