In the contemporary era, usage of computers for learning has been extensively increasing. Nonetheless, this became a debatable situation. Although somebody thinks it is beneficial, others comprehend that this has grim effects on the students. This essay will parse both the perceptions and in furtherance declares my opinion.
The services of the technology in the field of education has proven to be undeniable. The e-learning enhanced and revolutionized the children's study by providing bountiful information regarding discrete concepts. Digital and video lectures makes Learners flexibly absorb even the most convoluted topics like cake walk. For example, digital classes has numerous visual examples with three dimensional figures which enables pupil to imagine and correlate many things.
Although it has numerous surreal positive effects, over dependence may lead to disruption of imagination of the children. On the contrary to the former advantages, it is a canonical fact that it makes students inactive. Eventually children will be unable to works hard being overly dependent on the internet. Also the discussion and exchange of information among the learners diminishes. For instance, pupil no longer refer different books for assignments and projects, instead they just copy some information from the internet.
Hurtling towards my opinion, I however consider this advancement as a boon to the knowledge seekers because it can be accessed any time and anywhere unlike classroom lectures. It is quite obvious that the positives overshadows the disadvantages. Hence it can be concluded that use of this technology is mostly advantageous in knowledge enhancement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the contemporary era, usage of computers for learning has been...
^^
Line 1, column 315, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... perceptions and in furtherance declares my opinion. The services of the techn...
^^
Line 5, column 310, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...being overly dependent on the internet. Also the discussion and exchange of informat...
^^^^
Line 7, column 247, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ositives overshadows the disadvantages. Hence it can be concluded that use of this te...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, may, nonetheless, regarding, so, for example, for instance, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.728 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10509259121 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9515750811 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.625 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3125 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178902126891 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526147910235 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425176666584 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100639295043 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560975508521 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.63 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.