Computers are being used more and more in education and so there will sone be no role for the teacher in education. Do you agree or disagree? Why?
In recent times, computers have gained prominence as valuable tools for learning. This has led several to believe that teachers will eventually become old-fashioned in education. However, I disagree with this notion. In this essay, I will outline the reasons why human educators are indispensable and why their presence should be cherished in the field of education.
Firstly, technological advancements have provided support devices for performing tasks with efficiency. Consequently, they have offered students great facilities such as notes, study apps, lectures, and study guides, which traditional methods cannot match. Especially, the cost involved is comparatively less, so scholars do not need to spend any money on these resources as they are freely available. Moreover, digital learning is accessible from every corner of the world, whether it be a huge city or a remote village. Therefore, learners can stay at home and gain knowledge through their computers.
On the other hand, numerous people believe that studying is not limited to consuming online materials and succeeding in exams. It also involves a comprehensive understanding and the importance of psychological support for students. Thus, learning is valuable not only for studying the material but also for cognitive and emotional development, including morals and personal values. For instance, communication skills cannot be taught by computers; they are based on human experiences and can be taught by a lecturer at school. When learning with a tutor, they can provide emotional support to learners, understand them, and identify their strengths and weaknesses. What's more, they can foster a winning attitude within each student when they achieve something significant, which no computer in the world can do.
In conclusion, despite the increasing use of computers in education, teachers will always have an indispensable role to play. Their ability to connect emotionally, adapt instruction, promote critical thinking, provide moral guidance, and manage classrooms remains unmatched. Technology should be seen as a tool to enhance teaching, rather than as a replacement for the teacher.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-13 | quacquacquac11 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-13 | quacquacquac11 | 89 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 665, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...dentify their strengths and weaknesses. Whats more, they can foster a winning attitud...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1840.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64417177914 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06991314913 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653374233129 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8274769213 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.222222222 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24520746849 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615668980955 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568131293242 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136496817712 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511105621536 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.24 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.