Consumers are faced with increasing numbers of advertisements from competing companies. To what extent do you think
consumers are influenced by advertisements? What measures can be taken to protect them?
In recent years, people have often felt inundated with marketing propaganda in numerous forms. Personally, I believe that advertisements have a profound impact on the public and that it requires the involvement of authorities and the media to protect consumers from such negative influences.
Admittedly, being the target audience, shoppers are directly affected by advertising campaigns. Firstly, buyers frequently find themselves purchasing tawdry goods, deceived by their portrayal in commercials. In order to outcompete rivals and create brand awareness, companies tend to exaggerate the true quality of their products. As a result, unwary consumers who are swayed by glamorous advertisements could end up impulsively buying items that later disappoint them. Secondly, regardless of their form, advertisements might encourage people to adopt harmful habits. Adolescents, for example, may spend too much time on video games if over-exposed to commercials promoting those products and celebrity endorsement.
Therefore, strict measures should be taken to defend buyers from the adverse effects of commercials. It is most crucial for consumer protection agencies to be established and regulations to be imposed on the advertising industry by governments. Under stringent control, companies would be more responsible and truthful in publicizing their products, whether through telemarketing, online advertising or commercial advertising on prime time television. The mass media plays an indispensable part in reducing the negative influence of commercials on the public. If dominant social media platforms such as Facebook or Youtube as well as reputable newspapers or magazines show advertisements selectively, consumers could choose the most suitable and reliable goods with greater trust and confidence.
In conclusion, I would argue that the damaging effects commercials have on buyers are self - evident and that people can only be shielded from such harms with interference from governments and social media.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-04-24 | sonchip96hb | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 468, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'play'.
Suggestion: play
...n prime time television. The mass media plays an indispensable part in reducing the n...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.95189003436 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24485533306 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652920962199 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7446384572 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.714285714 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241525584164 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771101268357 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054992755041 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137612464597 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500319561014 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.23 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.65 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.