Convenience foods will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional methods of food preparation and traditional foods.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this oppinion?
Nowaday, package foods become increasingly popular but I disagree with traditional foods and traditional methods of food prepartion can be replaced by them.
Convenience foods have plenty of benefit especially for business man. It do not take too much time for people to prepare package foods. We can use them in some place not just at home. However, in my view, there are more advantages of traditional foods than convenience foods.
First of all, using traditional foods can preserve our culture. In Vietnam, there are a lot of cultural foods which can be prepared in traditional ways. For example, on Tet holiday, althought we can buy “banh chung” or “mut” in supermaket, we still make them on our own. While making them, all members in family join hand and talk together. It is very fun and thoughtful. Beside that, we can save the traditional culture which have been lasted from the past.
Moreover, using tradional foods is healthier the using convenience foods. We can choose the best ingredients to prepare food while we might not know exactly what ingridients we have in package foods. Convenience foods are produced in large amount so they are not fresher then traditional foods. Traditional foods have no chemical fertilizers but package foods have lots of them. Whereas convenience foods are made by machines in factories, traditional foods can be made by ourself and also by our love.
Overall, we should use traditional foods more than convenience foods. Each kind of foods have each benefit of itself. By the way, we can not replace traditional foods by convenience foods.
- Many people believe that formal ' pen and paper' examinations are not the best method of assessing educational achievement.What is your view of examinations? 56
- The importance of biodiversity is being more widely recognised as increasing numbers of species come under threat.what can be done to maintain biodiversity? 73
- Convenience foods will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional methods of food preparation and traditional foods.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this oppinion? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Nowaday, package foods become increasing...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...od prepartion can be replaced by them. Convenience foods have plenty of benefit...
^^
Line 2, column 75, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'does'?
Suggestion: does
...benefit especially for business man. It do not take too much time for people to pr...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ditional foods than convenience foods. First of all, using traditional foods ca...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which have been lasted from the past. Moreover, using tradional foods is healt...
^^
Line 4, column 273, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...in large amount so they are not fresher then traditional foods. Traditional foods ha...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... made by ourself and also by our love. Overall, we should use traditional foods...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, moreover, so, still, then, whereas, while, for example, in fact, kind of, by the way, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11363636364 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8487669106 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4614480703 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.0526315789 106.682146367 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.8947368421 20.7667163134 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21052631579 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363027430574 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140406136361 0.084324248473 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111138702453 0.0667982634062 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267296287615 0.151304729494 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106906755321 0.056905535591 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.