countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere. Do you think this is a positive or negative problem?
It is said that countries are getting more and more similar to each other as the result of the spread of global products as people now can purchase the same products anywhere in the world. In my opinion, I believe that this trend has a negative impact on the development of a nation in the aspects of tradition and culture.
First of all, each country has its own language and ethos that were made through its history. These features play an important role in shaping a country as well as make the uniqueness of a nation. If the restless advance of international brands gets into every corner of the world, they might be one day oust the traditional objects of a nation which would be a loss of richness and diversity in the world as well as lead to the sad disappearance of theses precious values. For example, what would "com lam" - an Vietnamese traditional dish made from rice cooked in a bamboo's branch - be without this kind of tree?
Secondly, with the trend in opening the domestic market to attract international investment in most countries' policy recently, a foreign company can easily get into the market of a nation and construct a lot of factories for their manufacturing and provide their products for people in that country. the spread of these multinational products can lead to the loss of local products as people here might turn to buy new brands rather than one that they used to buy for centuries. As a result, traditional products might disappear and a lot of people who live on these products will be put in the state of being unemployed
Finally, tourism numbers can also be affected negatively as travelers could not find interest in exploring things that they can now visit or see in their own place. For example, seeing the same products in a foreign country will no more attract tourists and it would be hard for tourists to opened their wallets to buy these things as souvenirs.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that local objects suit local conditions best and that faceless uniformity worldwide is an unwelcome and dreary prospect.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-03 | Phuongtranldh | 73 | view |
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere Do you think this is a positive or negative problem 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 521, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ample, what would 'com lam' - an Vietnamese traditional dish made from r...
^^
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...ttract international investment in most countries policy recently, a foreign company can ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ir products for people in that country. the spread of these multinational products ...
^^^
Line 5, column 621, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be put in the state of being unemployed Finally, tourism numbers can also be aff...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...de is an unwelcome and dreary prospect.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, as well as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67398748877 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519444444444 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.9735947908 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.090909091 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.7272727273 20.7667163134 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.06120827912 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194996788447 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792523010633 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907907186971 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118261315617 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110278417531 0.056905535591 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.