Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is positive or negative development?
countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.
Do you think this is positive or negative development?
As for the development by the time, the interaction among countries become more frequently as well as make more similarly for each country. I strongly believe that it is a positive trend on the earth.
There are several reasons why I believe that the trend is positive. The circumstance proves a well technology development as far as the citizens could obtain the foreign goods at the home easily. Before, traveling is the only way to buy the foreign goods as long as we aim to get somethings, which is inconvenient. But we can be shopping on the online shopping center now to browse the foreign stuffs as well as waiting the products arrive to the home via the quickly international transport system. The convenience of buying the foreign goods proves that the technics is improving sustainable.
On the other hand, the similarity of each country accelerates the communication of each other. it is not rarely seen on the modern society that the culture mixing food is discovered. For instance, a new invention “Pizza Bun” is invented between Italy and China, which represent that a new culture would be created as soon as some countries are mixed. Likewise, we may appreciate and observe a stimulation as far as the birth of culture mixing. it is an effective way to bring a variety of creativity to the world via the cooperation between the amount of countries.
In conclusion, the similarity among the countries may bring a new impact or even change the world positively. Hence, I completely believe that this is a positive development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-22 | cocococo123 | 56 | view |
| 2019-05-22 | cocococo123 | 56 | view |
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development. 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 61
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011. 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Countries
countries are becoming more and more similar beca...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s is positive or negative development? As for the development by the time, the ...
^^^
Line 6, column 95, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...erates the communication of each other. it is not rarely seen on the modern societ...
^^
Line 6, column 199, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...ing food is discovered. For instance, a new invention 'Pizza Bun' is invented betwe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 454, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... as far as the birth of culture mixing. it is an effective way to bring a variety ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, likewise, may, similarly, so, well, as for, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95532646048 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93016943868 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529209621993 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1482986656 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.125 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1875 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389457938785 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11803227516 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.19000205532 0.0667982634062 284% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273510170375 0.151304729494 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.24013338068 0.056905535591 422% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.