Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
The world has become a global village due to the availability of similar goods all over the world. While some people believe that this trend has such adverse effects on worldwide market, others argue that it holds such potential advantages more than the negative ones. This essay will discuss both viewpoints and come to a reasonable conclusion.
On the one hand, the reason why I believe the convenience of buying the same products anywhere in the world leads to the first drawback: the reduction in domestic products. It is widely believed that a plenty of inhabitants is a fan of foreign goods, especially the number seems to increase in developing countries. With the likeliness of products sold everywhere in the world, a number of people would choose to support items from developed countries. This course of action would lead to the disappearance of several products. Another reason to disapprove of this trend is the loss of cultural diversity. We cannot deny the fact that clothes are liked to one’s culture. People are likely to ignore these conventional clothes in their own country as they can pursuit imported ones with nominal prices which they believe to have much more quality. Consequently, such development influences our cultural aspects negatively.
On the other hand, the condition in which people can choose to buy what they want everywhere in the world is greatly desirable due to various reasons. Primarily speaking, this trend creates a tough competitive environment market. This urges them to push themselves up, in order to revitalize their own brands. New inventions are introduced to attract customers. As people get better choices of products, there comes the higher quality as well as the more affordable prices. Moreover, this development can also promote local products of one’s country in another country. It will probably increase the productivity, reputation and sales, upgrade the economic level of one’s country.
In conclusion, this growth will have beneficial and detrimental effects on individual and on the country’s economy because every issue has its dual nature, so people should weigh the pros and cons to make it balance.
- The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 84
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the proportion of renewable energy in total enrgy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Children who are brought up in families that do not have large amounts of money are better prepared to deal with the problems of adult life than children brought up by wealthy parents To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 44
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, moreover, so, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26857142857 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82886578555 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588571428571 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3715348791 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0526315789 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4210526316 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15789473684 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283570409795 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069065735286 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497731977343 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158146077696 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399152722456 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.