Cycling is a healthier and more environmentally friendly means of transport However it is getting less popular What are the causes and solutions

Essay topics:

Cycling is a healthier and more environmentally friendly means of transport. However, it is getting less popular. What are the causes and solutions?

In the contemporary world, although riding a bicycle rather than other modes of transport offers a medium in protecting the environment and enhancing people's fitness, it really garners less attention among the masses. There exist several sound reasons for this uncommon use, and several initiatives are supposed to be introduced to mitigate the issue of broad interest.

To begin with, there are two primary underlying explanations for this unpopularity of bikes. First and foremost, it is manifest that motor vehicles are increasingly available, which is instrumental in improving the efficiency when residents engage in daily commuting. To be more precise, thanks to the wide appearance of motorbikes and cars with mass production at affordable prices, it would by all means decrease the time distribution to travelling, not to mention the fact that using motor vehicles instead of bikes is far less physically demanding. Consequently, it is really impractical to expect cycling to come into vogue. Besides, modern individuals are insufficiently aware of the significance of environmental protection as well as not being concerned about the negatives that their daily private vehicles could inflict on the surroundings. They have a propensity to put higher emphasis on their personal interests despite the outspread news coverage regarding the threat of exhaust fumes released from motor vehicles, thereby neglecting the values of commuting by bikes these days.

It is high time that earnest and urgent endeavors to increase the popularity of this environmentally friendly vehicle were jointly made by both the government and people involved. First of all, the authorities are supposed to impose heavier tax on private vehicle owners or increase the price of petrol fuelling motor vehicles. This solution functions as a medium to discourage the masses from overusing motorbikes or cars, empowering them to opt for cycling which is greatly beneficial for their health and the environment. What is more, many propagation campaigns had better be launched in a timely manner to heighten social awareness of this matter. In that spectrum, inhabitants are capable of cultivating the understanding of potential risks arising from excessive use of cars and gaining a deeper insight into how to enhance their physical endurance and fitness levels through taking advantage of bicycles.

To sum up, riding a bicycle, in spite of its merits, has not depicted a common picture in the daily routine for several primary reasons, and some measures should be put into practice simultaneously to improve the situation.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-07-27 quynhhtrangg2512 89 view
Essays by user quynhhtrangg2512 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 782, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not being concerned about the negatives that their daily private vehicles could ...
^^
Line 5, column 590, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a timely manner" with adverb for "timely"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...gation campaigns had better be launched in a timely manner to heighten social awareness of this ma...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, first, if, really, regarding, so, well, as well as, first of all, in spite of, to begin with, to sum up, what is more

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2210.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 404.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4702970297 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01125230218 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 176.041082164 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623762376238 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 708.3 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.1296137692 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.857142857 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8571428571 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3571428571 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116394591458 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0348212823565 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384754017208 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0562794250518 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419846538684 0.056905535591 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.04 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.73 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 146.0 78.4519038076 186% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.