In developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers, while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and I

Limited access to education has led children in remote locations to live under poor conditions. Schools and teachers, accordingly, are believed to a long-term solution, which will guarantee a better life for disadvantaged children. However, others argue that technology is the master key to this issue. In this essay, I will discuss both these views before giving my own opinion.

There is not any difficulty to understand why the role of schools and teachers is highly acclaimed. Unlike developed nations, many rural areas have faced a severe teacher and school shortage, leading to illiteracy among children. Therefore, erecting more schools would help rural pupils acquire new knowledge as well as social skills more easily, all of which are conducive to their mental and physical development at early age. Apart from this, rural communities can gradually escape from poverty through far-reaching changes in education.

On the other hand, without the help of technology, children in remote villages will have many difficulties in access to education. The reason is due to geographic barriers. Since the distance from their home to school is far and they often go to school on foot, dropping out often occurs. Therefore, by equipping young children with online lessons or programmes, they can self-study at home without having to go to class or being completely dependent on teachers. Also, this is a good chance for them to familiarize themselves with online education – a state of the art educational mode.

In my view, schools and technology play an equally important role in rural and remote education because both have their own values. The concerted action between these factors, therefore, will promise disadvantaged children a better studying condition.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...far-reaching changes in education. On the other hand, without the help of t...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, however, if, so, therefore, well, apart from, as well as, in my view, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35563380282 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80262889524 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637323943662 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1738259173 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.4 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201055584722 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591376310714 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461080606333 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0904735355136 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058613618693 0.056905535591 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.