In developing countries children in rural communities have less access to education Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and Inte

People have different views about the solution of education for children in rural communities. While some people argue that building more schools and teachers will help to solve this problem, I believe that we can solve the problem by providing more features such as computers and Internet access for children.
On the one hand, there are many reasons why people believe that the lack of schools and teachers is the cause. If there are more schools for children there, they can learn a lot from their classmates, their teachers. For instance, in rural areas, there are few teachers while the number of children is increasing quickly. Teachers can not take care of all children in the class. So the students do not have many chances to learn and communicate. In addition, when there are not enough schools for children, they have to study in a farther school and travel a long way to get to the nearest one.
On the other hand, I believe that computers and internet access can help to solve this problem. Firstly, they will not have to travel a long distance to school, and they are able to connect with their friends and teachers. It is difficult for teachers to teach face-to-face in rural areas. Secondly, when they have computers and internet access, they can study anywhere and anytime. They can not only take any materials on the Internet by a click but also update the latest knowledge, which is necessary for their studies.
In conclusion, despite the importance of the number of schools and students, I believe that computers with internet access can improve the problem of education in rural areas.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1337.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84420289855 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47858661729 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463768115942 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 408.6 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4762238415 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395455952738 0.244688304435 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144945265491 0.084324248473 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121424324216 0.0667982634062 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280921892085 0.151304729494 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115284227162 0.056905535591 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.