Advancing technology nowadays had completely changed human's social lives. The use of internet helped to link the people all around the world and create a communication that is unaffected by space and time. This great change can bring both positive and negative development to the society.
Firstly, the positive outcome of this change would be that the distance between one and another reduced greatly. With the use of social media apps like Facebook, Instagram and more, one could easily connect with old friends and get to know each other's lives by keeping track with each other's status. This is unthinkable in the past when old connections easily fade away as people go on their own paths and lost contact with each other. Besides that, the conveniency of building a community online also let people from all over the world that have similar interests be able to gather together. An artist can easily upload an art work on the DeviantArt website and be given comments or likes by users form the whole world. A person who want to learn to code can easily register at the Code Academy website and ask questions online in order to receive answers by experts all around the world. The technology nowadays had made it possible for every individual that surfs the internet to be able to interact with all of the people online instead of being limited to the people that is physically near only.
On the flip side of the coin, this change of relationships can also lead to downsides too. Being too obsessed to forming virtual relationships, people ended up neglecting real-time relationships instead. It had become a common sight that on a family or friend gathering, people look down on their phones instead of socializing with each other. Communicating online become so often that some even find it uncomfortable to communicate back in reality. Other than that, the design of the system of social medias nowadays like giving likes, following or more also gives people the motive to attract attention and fulfill their desires to be popular. While being creative to attract attention is being encouraged, some may go to the lengths of pretending to be someone they aren't like pretending to be pretty or wealthy.
This lead to the phenomenon when people online may not be what they seem to be and society in the internet becomes pretentious。
In conclusion, the relationship between people that had changed drastically due to technology development nowadays bring both positive and negative effects. Everyone should cope with this situation wisely and always be aware of the downsides of it in order to make the best out of this change.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...others lives by keeping track with each others status. This is unthinkable in the past...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1009, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...he internet to be able to interact with all of the people online instead of being limited ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 770, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...engths of pretending to be someone they arent like pretending to be pretty or wealthy...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, look, may, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 41.998997996 181% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2201.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 444.0 315.596192385 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95720720721 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63660446446 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522522522523 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 701.1 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2022134938 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.277777778 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29528890325 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0996958597713 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816848123069 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188738931963 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811286617563 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.