Development in technology have brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live simpler to solve the environment problems. Others, however, believe technology is way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and give your opinion
With the proliferation of contemporary lifestyles comes a wide range of socio-economic dilemmas. Indeed, the question of whether dealing with on enormous environmental issues need the advance in technology, or only accept a simple way of life remains a source of controversy. Although some people think that accepting a simpler life is beneficial to tackle the matters, I would argue that developing in science and technology is essential for the authorities to work together to solve the problems.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why a simpler way of life does have some benefits for the ecological system. Firstly, less demand on modern facilities, which are electronics household’s appliances and personal transportations, can mitigate the harmful impact on the environment. This is due to the fact that the mentioned usages produce toxic emissions to the atmosphere by burning traditional fossil fuel, which is the main core cause of environmental degradation. Secondly, wooden furniture that has been using in people’s households is an array of products from logging companies. If using those goods could be reduced effectively, the deforestations would be declined significantly. As a result, the better healthy environment is preserved as well as contributed to stabilizing the natural world.
On the other hand, I believe that in spite of numerous benefits of changing human’s behavior to impact effectively on the solutions, it is more beneficial to renovate technology results in more favorable outcomes. One particularly good illustration for this is that eco-friendly products, such as electrical vehicles, eco-friendly plans, and eco-friendly cars do not consume the fossil fuel, which is detrimental to the environment. As a result of these, renewable goods are not only practical but also suitable to develop human society. Another advantage of an advance in technology in which there is a waste recycle advancement contributing considerably to deal with on the issues. For instance, plastic waste has been recycled to protect the environment.
In conclusion, while some individuals say that it is better to live simpler life to handle with the environment, it seems to me that advance in technology is much more reasonable.
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- Some people prefer to work for the large company, while others prefer to work for the small company. Discuss both views and give your opinions. 73
- Although more and more people read news on the Internet, newspapers will remain the most important source of news. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Although more and more people read news on the Internet, newspapers will remain the most important source of news. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Although more and more people read news on the Internet, newspapers will remain the most important source of news. Do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 40, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lifestyles'' or 'lifestyle's'?
Suggestion: lifestyles'; lifestyle's
With the proliferation of contemporary lifestyles comes a wide range of socio-economic di...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...nge of socio-economic dilemmas. Indeed, the question of whether dealing with on enormous environmental ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1926.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50285714286 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36246265437 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.842054954 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.4 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189930262359 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522312457105 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574916598313 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111994236056 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434088635586 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.