Discuss the advantage and disadvantage of giving international aids to poor countries.
It is apparent that international assistance programs and multinational charity organizations are gaining a great deal of media attention in recent decades. Although these international aids have partially improved the life quality in poor nations, i think it could potentially hamper a country’s development.
On the one hand, there are a good few reasons why poverty-stricken countries would benefit from international aids. First, some assistance programs from developed countries such as raising funds and commodity donations could help low-income citizens in poor countries to diminish the risk of poverty and have better living standards. For example, Due to mutual aids from cooperations worldwide, North Korean people are provided with adequate food and relief operations to maintain their life, which remarkably has reduced poverty rate in this country. Second, thanks to some world health organizations, underprivileged children in developing countries with crippling conditions now can be treated in state-of-the-art medical institutions without paying money. This means that their fatal diseases would be eradicated, which is instrumental in increasing their life expectancy.
On the other hand, multinational aids could remarkably fraught with long-term negative consequences. The first reason is that affluent countries' allocation of financial funds to poor countries could enable citizens to rely heavily on them. This means that they would have no motivation to work harder for better living quality, leading to an increase in unemployment rate. Another reason is that not only does international assistance take a heavy toll on labor force but also it could contribute to the economic depression in the prosperous nations. This could be implied that if these nations incessantly focus on funding programs, the likelihood of increasing tax in order to maintain national revenues is inevitable, which subsequently make citizens bear some serious financial burden.
In conclusion, offering international aid to low-income countries could potentially pose a harmful threat to the process of economic and social development.
- Poor students or students who come from rural areas often find it difficult to have access touniversity education. Some people think universities should make it especially easy for themto study. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Online shopping is replacing shopping in stores. Is it a positive or negative development? 89
- Rich countries should not employ skilled labour from poor countries, as poor countries need the workers more. Do you agree or disagree. 56
- Detailed descriptions of crimes are often given in the newspaper or on TV Some people think it has bad consequences on the society and so should be restricted To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems To what extend do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...roved the life quality in poor nations, i think it could potentially hamper a cou...
^
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...nces. The first reason is that affluent countries allocation of financial funds to poor c...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1840.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8785942492 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24867189495 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613418530351 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7760094241 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.538461538 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0769230769 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106588116943 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431407784911 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407000795645 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0861987127186 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377062012649 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.12 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.