Some people think international cooperation has brought benefits to world environmental protection, while others believe more benefits have been brought to international business. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Recent years have witnessed an increase in the number of international cooperations, raising many questions of its substantial impacts worldwide. Although environmental advantages related could be pronounced, this pattern actually bestows more benefits for international business.
On the one hand, there are many environmental benefits from international cooperations. First, These multinational cooperations are the pioneers in the consumption of alternative energy besides fossil fuel. This would remarkably reduce the carbon dioxide and methane concentrations in the atmosphere, contributing to the rehabilitation and restoration of the environment. Second, international cooperations are invariably associated with a high degree of capital investments in environmental projects for their long-term growth. In fact, many technological companies subsidize projects developing electric cars in order to minimize gas-driven car dependency, limiting exhaust fume emissions.
On the one hand, it should be acknowledged that multinational companies could culminate in considerable advantages for international business. First, These cooperations could advertise and export the local products of one country to other nations. This would lead to many trade deals and negotiations with other nations with economic wealth, fostering the economic prosperity of that country. In addition, international cooperations have a penchant for establishing many branches in many nations, thereby increasing the national revenues of the host nations due to their responsibility for corporate tax and excise tax.
In conclusion, multinational companies result in many advantages pertaining to international business rather than the environment. Additionally, cooperations are highly recommended to undertake more initiatives to guarantee the environmental sustainability for their long-term development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-01 | msbhardwaj | 61 | view |
| 2017-09-02 | Janaserene | 73 | view |
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote naturalenvironment, such as the South Pole. Do you agree or disagree with thisdevelopment? 73
- Are famous people treated unfairly by the media? Should they be givenmore privacy, or is the price of their fame an invastion into their privatelife? 78
- Nowadays, international tourism is the biggest industry in the world. Unfortunately, international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favor of t 61
- Celebrities make a very good living out of media attention and have chosen to live in the public spotlight. They have no right to complain when they feel the media are intruding on their privacy. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 170, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommended undertaking'.
Suggestion: recommended undertaking
.... Additionally, cooperations are highly recommended to undertake more initiatives to guarantee the envir...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, first, second, so, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.5577689243 5.12529762239 128% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.6395071051 2.80592935109 130% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589641434263 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.1 1.60771543086 131% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.360579423 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.615384615 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3076923077 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185984344114 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737055314801 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543298603136 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126536362475 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316411770886 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.0946893788 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 9.89 50.2224549098 20% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 20.77 12.4159519038 167% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.