Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should be paid according to how much their students learn. Give specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
In this day and age, the education sector is crucial as there have been various policies regarding payment for teachers. One such is that the extent to which their students learn determines the salary of teachers. From my perspective, I am not in favor of this statement.
The first point to bear in mind is that in theory, this method might sound an ingenious as well as an innovative idea. However, when put in reality, the fact that teachers getting paid based on how much their students learn may prove impractical and impossible to achieve. There has been no ingenious way of assessing accurately how much a student learns. Therefore, this would be extremely unfair for teachers if their salaries depend on the amount of knowledge their students learn. Furthermore, the prospect of the teaching profession is already failing to attract talented and well-rounded individuals. If governments put the mentioned policy into practice, it will surely make the outlook for teaching seem even more daunting. Thus, there is every likelihood that the education sector would be lacking in human resources. Conclusively, the policy is not only impossible to adopt, but it also negatively affects the quantity of workforce of the education sector.
Another point to mention is that paying teachers for the evaluation of how much their students learn might cause detrimental impacts on the quality of teaching. Because of the condition that the more students learn, the more teachers get paid, it seems schooling is turning into a competition of academic performance. As a result, this might prompt teachers to use dishonest methods so that their students get as high scores as possible. Therefore, it would increase their salaries, regardless of whether their students learn or not. Besides, not all students can study well; some are even unable to grasp the most basic concepts. Consequently, with the little salaries teachers earn, they would feel demoralized in teaching those slow-witted students. Without question, the mentioned policy would cause adverse effects on the quality of teaching.
In conclusion, the policy that the salaries of teachers are determined by how much knowledge their students gain is not quite a good idea. After my meticulous analysis, the mentioned policy not only makes the prospect of the educational profession bleaker, but it also has profound effects on the quality of teaching.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-01 | beastronggirl | 73 | view |
| 2014-10-04 | uday.narang | 60 | view |
- More and more people are relying on the private car as their major means of transportation Describe some of the problems over reliance on cars can cause and suggest at least one possible solution 89
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers should be paid according to how much their students learn Give specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 73
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- There are many different types of music in the world today Why do we need music Is the traditional music of a country more than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2026.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23514211886 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78942214127 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524547803618 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 613.8 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0342470197 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.3 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.35 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219413302409 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706951463627 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682261408803 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133629811232 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486995770222 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.