Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of product producers to avoid extra packaging of products.

In this overpopulated world, humanity needs more product to consume. Generally, manufacturers have found some ways to protect products' and maintain their normal situation as long as possible. Packaging products is one of the most well-known types of saving objects from any outdoor danger. This way has some detrimental results for people which can be more dangerous than avoiding from packaging the products.

Consumers should avoid packaged products because of unhealthy issues. Everyone knows that most of the companies use plastic things to cover the products. How unlucky that plastic covering cause lots of diseases in long-term such as cancer. It becomes more detrimental when it comes together with foods and drinks. For example, people buy water from supermarkets in plastic bottles. These plastic bottles affect the quality of water and we drink unvisible plastic things with the water unconsciously most of the time.

Secondly, companies must take some precautions towards dangers deriving from plastic covering. As a response to the capitalist system, most of the manufacturers just give importance to making more profit rather than humanity's health. These companies must be aware of the lethal results of this kind of selfish way to earn money. Unfortunately, the manufacturers' happy situations can cause customers' unhappiness on the other hand. For instance, companies can sell water in high-qualified glass bottles instead of plastic and cheap bottles. Thus, everyone can know what they drink, just water or water with plastic.

The packaged productS must be avoided by not only consumers but also producers at the same time. People should maintain a distance from it for their health. Moreover, producers must not choose plastic to cover the products not to cause others' unhealthiness. I hope so, it will be better in the future as a result of everyone's awareness.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, kind of, such as, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39864864865 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80012750153 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570945945946 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.0859683962 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.9 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184558294006 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654336619176 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10432937508 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133301874166 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822867563493 0.056905535591 145% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.