Due to the availability of fast food nowadays, many people have low-quality diets.
What problems can this cause?
What can governments do to resolve these problems?
In recent years, on account of the fast food convenience and availability, a lot of people decide to eat out more frequently without paying attention to their diets. Consequently, there are many problems related to health, environment, and work rate occur. To deal with these issues, governments need to take action.
There are a number of problems happened due to unhealthy diets. The first thing is an increase in illnesses such as diabetes, heart disease or cancer. The next one is pollution, which is a result of single use plastic bags or disposable plastics. The fast food industry creates tons of trashes that could not be dissolved within the next hundred years, and it affects negatively on every habitats on earth. The last thing is related to workers’ productivity. If workers continue to eat fast food again and again, their working efficiency will be reduced which can affect both their careers and the company.
In order to convince people to have a healthy eating habit, governments need to put forward a number of proposals to encourage people consuming less fast food. Firstly, they can organize public campaigns to raise people awareness about the harmful effects of eating too much unhealthy food. Secondly, authorities can work with supermarkets and small markets to reduce the cost of fresh ingredients like vegetables or meats, and increase the price of plastic bags so that more people will choose to cook for themselves rather than buying food selling on the streets. Lastly, governments can make companies provide healthy meals for workers with reasonable price. As a result of these changes, a larger number of people would be able to eat more healthy.
In conclusion, there are many problems connected with having low-quality diets such as health, environment, and work rate problems. Therefore, it is crucial that authorities need to provide some useful solutions to cope with these issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-23 | MINHCHAULENGUYEN | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In recent years, on account of the fast ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es, governments need to take action. There are a number of problems happened ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...se plastic bags or disposable plastics. The fast food industry creates tons of tras...
^^^
Line 3, column 418, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... negatively on every habitats on earth. The last thing is related to workers’ produ...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... both their careers and the company. In order to convince people to have a he...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e would be able to eat more healthy. In conclusion, there are many problems c...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17252396166 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72187222901 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575079872204 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3700231872 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.1875 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5625 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250699226146 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748939059398 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541768414443 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14704158388 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285292827162 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.