Education is not a luxury, but a basic human right and as such should be free for everyone irrespective of personal wealth. Do you agree or disagree?
Education has always proven itself to be the pillar of development across all sectors of society. With its importance, schooling should be a tool that is accessible to everyone without having financial liabilities to inhibit it. As such, I wholeheartedly agree with the given notion.
The foremost case for free education lies in the fact that it enables the workforce to be more productive and efficient. An educated workforce will prove to be an asset in this rapidly evolving world, where automation and technology are inseparable in flourishing industries. Jobs that require manual labor are steadily diminishing as machines can do the same tasks with better outcomes and fewer resources required. A prime case in point is the manufacturing industry, where product assembly could be more accurately done by robots than humans. As such, with an instated system of education unrestrained by budgets, unemployment will be less dire, and higher-skilled workers can be trained, in turn mobilizing the nation towards speedy development.
Another reason in favor of this is the drawbacks of monetized education, especially in terms of solving social issues. One headache all nations face is dealing with job provision for its citizen. Were the people to be schooled adequately, they could better leverage their employment opportunities. Otherwise, not only will an increasing part of the population face joblessness, but the government will have to spend more on social welfare bills. This is indeed a problem for every economy, and it could be effectively tackled by allowing free access to study.
Finally, the debate settles on the ethical aspects of charging to be educated. Human rights dictate a person to have all development rights, and the best possible instrument for that is through schools and institutions. By ostracizing access to learning for reasons of being unable to pay for them, it is equivalent to taking the rights of aspiring and harboring dreams to become a productive member of society. Should money be an integral part of education, inequalities would be widened, gender-based dogmas persistent, social crimes left undealt, among other issues that would ensue. It is not only going to affect the economy or overall development of a country alone, but it would also be the prohibitor of the civil society we try to strive for.
Ultimately, concerning the topic from developmental, economical, and ethical points of view, it is proven that studying is imperative to every person of all backgrounds. As such, liberating it from monetary worries is not just a vital need, but a necessity for every aspect of society.
- Task 2 Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socializing online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person 84
- Some countries are struggling with an increase in the rate of crime Many people think that having more police on the streets is the only way to reduce crimes To what extent do you agree 84
- Topic 1 People in the limelight have a responsibility to set an example for others by their good behavior To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Many countries now face an economic downturn so it is better for each country to focus on its own problems rather than helping other countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 319, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'take'?
Suggestion: take
...le to pay for them, it is equivalent to taking the rights of aspiring and harboring dr...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 13.1623246493 213% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2219.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 423.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24586288416 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9992556646 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581560283688 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 714.6 506.74238477 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9531289883 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.95 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.15 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.1 7.06120827912 16% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245617423829 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681126261886 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423874835819 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1238779965 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463641714292 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 78.4519038076 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.