The education you receive from your family is more important than the education you receive from the school.
To what extent do you agree with this statement and why?
Many people assume that school is not the only source of knowledge, and in some cases, a family can provide more useful education. I strongly agree with the statement considering that the curriculum set by the schools cannot represent the real skill demands to survive in this life. This essay will elaborate on an adverse side of school’s educational system and a positive element that family’s education system can offer.
To begin with, schools are specifically designed to impart necessary knowledge for employment purposes, which is obviously insufficient to cover what people need in life. Most school’s curriculum teaches, for example, Mathematics and Physics, and the knowledge will mostly be beneficial when you are applying for a specific vacancy. However, as life is not only a matter of obtaining a job, we need to have skills to, for instance, cope with personal issues: stress, decision-making, and communication. Those skill examples are not inside most schools’ purposes, thus leaving people without those crucial abilities.
In contrast, a family can offer knowledge to survive, such as financial literacy. This knowledge is apparently regarded useless by formal education systems; Yet, the fact shows otherwise. Many successful students who are accepted in top companies struggle with their financial management. Most of them confessed that schools have to put inside the financial knowledge into their curriculum as the benefit seems real. Few of them said that their family incessantly provides them with financial knowledge, thus allowing them to manage their money efficiently and even outstandingly. This ability enables them to survive in the real world.
All in all, I believe that family has a substantial role in supplying basic but important education knowledge for people. Relying only upon skills taught in school will not invariably guarantee success as its syllabus is more or less designed for job-oriented skills. Instead, to survive in life, we need more survival skills that are beyond what schools afford to provide.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-07 | Bimandana_26 | 78 | view |
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town 78
- The diagram below shows a possible future means of home energy production 84
- The diagram below shows a possible future means of home energy production 11
- The diagrams below give information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 52
- The graph below gives information about how much people in the United States and the United Kingdom spend on fuel 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, however, if, so, thus, for example, for instance, in contrast, such as, in some cases, more or less, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1746.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43925233645 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86991814498 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579439252336 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2077606137 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.125 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0625 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187964357967 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599691385305 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376833257754 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115977740929 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479299187831 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.