The environment we are living in is in danger due to various problems…so who do u think should be responsible to solve it? Is it the governments, organization or each individual?
It is becoming increasingly apparent the growing dangers of the environment that we live in. Terrorism due to Islamic State (ISIS) radicals and increasing crime rates within the suburbs we live in are the two main issues being openely discussed globally. These dangers have become global issues affecting innocent people that governments, organisations and individuals have taken matters to their hands to curb this global crisis.
As ISIS takes centre stage with its latest attacks in France (Nice and Paris), many of the developed countries with power around the world has come together as a sign of solidarity against these terror attacks. In this instance it is the responsibility of the government to implement laws and harsh punishments for those who have made a conscious decision towards harming human lives. It is also the governments responsibility to invest, train and mobilise the police force as well as local intelligence agencies to crack down on all suspicious personnel to extract information and data. By being a step ahead of the terrorists and of their plans, the governments has resources and an upper hand into preventing tragedies from occurring in the future.
Similarly, the Australian government passed the Anti-Terrorism Act in parliament in 2005 to curb and protect the nation against any terrorist threats to National security and Australian lives.
The counter terrorism actions implemented by organisations such as the United Nations(UN),North Atlantic Treaty Organisation(NATO) and the G7, assisted by international organisations like Interpol, Central Intelligence Agency(CIA) and the FBI has resulted in monitoring terror movements and preventing their attacks across the globe.
Individuals in our society have also taken a stand against terrorism and criminals by forming neighbourhood watches. If suspicious activity is observed they are reported to the crime stoppers hotline for further action to be taken. This has created safe neighbourhoods within our community.
In conclusion, I believe there is no single body or individual,who is responsible for solving these issues of international interest. But it is the collective efforts by governments, international organisations and individuals working together to make the world a safer place to live in.
- Scientist agree that people are damaging their health by eating too much junk food. Some people think that the answer to this problem is to educate people. Others think education will not work. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- The environment we are living in is in danger due to various problems…so who do u think should be responsible to solve it? Is it the governments, organization or each individual? 81
- Today, the quality of life in large cities is decreasing. Discuss the causes and solutions. 81
- Whether or not someone achieve their aims is mostly a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Despite huge improvements in healthcare, the overall standard of physical health in many developed countries is now falling. What could be the reason for this trend, and what can be done to reverse it? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...rds harming human lives. It is also the governments responsibility to invest, train and mob...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 88, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , North
...ganisations such as the United NationsUN,North Atlantic Treaty OrganisationNATO and th...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 63, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , who
...ve there is no single body or individual,who is responsible for solving these issues...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'similarly', 'so', 'well', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.297872340426 0.247107183377 121% => OK
Verbs: 0.159574468085 0.155533422707 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0851063829787 0.0946595960268 90% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0292553191489 0.0501214627716 58% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0372340425532 0.0437548338989 85% => OK
Prepositions: 0.119680851064 0.122226691241 98% => OK
Participles: 0.0691489361702 0.0403226058552 171% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.23525267607 2.80594681477 115% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0345744680851 0.0326793684256 106% => OK
Particles: 0.00265957446809 0.00163938923432 162% => OK
Determiners: 0.106382978723 0.0861772015684 123% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.021408717616 0% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.00797872340426 0.011925033212 67% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2294.0 1933.35771543 119% => OK
No of words: 349.0 316.048096192 110% => OK
Chars per words: 6.57306590258 6.12580529183 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20517956788 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.426934097421 0.374742101984 114% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.343839541547 0.28420135186 121% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.252148997135 0.203846283523 124% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.191977077364 0.137316102897 140% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23525267607 2.80594681477 115% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.037074148 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595988538682 0.56093040696 106% => OK
Word variations: 69.1270359109 60.7387585426 114% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0891783567 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.9285714286 20.7743622355 120% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6335450672 49.517814964 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.857142857 127.492653851 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9285714286 20.7743622355 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.642857142857 0.814263465372 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38877755511 137% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.99599198397 75% => OK
Readability: 59.3125255833 49.1944974215 121% => OK
Elegance: 2.15294117647 1.69124875643 127% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381479318886 0.332605444948 115% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0861952687668 0.102741220458 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0542369356349 0.0668466124924 81% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.625933874326 0.534860350844 117% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.171260632978 0.148594505496 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166703108526 0.134430193775 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895627455304 0.0742795772207 121% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.253878314555 0.324371583561 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0873883121493 0.0638462369009 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233831289701 0.228012699653 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0785596413796 0.058150111329 135% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.68436873747 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.41683366733 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 5.90881763527 51% => OK
Negative topic words: 10.0 2.5751503006 388% => Less negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 0.0 1.9629258517 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 13.0 10.4468937876 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 81.4606741573 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.25 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.