Technology has enhanced several factors such as human cotidianity and its issues. the technological development has helped to stablish some critical environmental aspects that human beings have done throughtout history. However, nowadays our insights are still restricted and the environmental catastrophe is about to explote. Furthermore, I partially agree with the statement.
Dispite of the huge potential of the human mind and their technological advances, both natural resources and non-renewable resources are being used improperly due to the lack of awareness of people. Science has attempted to focus its research on find a plethora of solutions to keep the equilibrium of the planet earth, achieving extensive accomplishments in general terms. Nonetheless the environmental damage is being irreversible and technology maybe not give all the support to the enviroment requires. For instance, chemists with the help of biologists have been developing some bacterias capable of eliminating plastic waste, but it is at an early stage where its secondary effects are unknown yet. For that reason they cannot liberate easily those advances, and altough they are doing their nest effort to save the plane, the oceans, rivers and any source of water are being contaminated by thousand of people day by day. Another clear illustration is the atmospheric pollution and the fight of scientists to control the environmental panorama. Cleaning techniques have been invented to filter the air pollution but the yield of those procedures requires a lot of energy represented in economic terms that most countries are not willing to invest.
This is a constantly race between natural disasters and the improvement of technology by means of sciencie. Nonetheless, the current environmental risks are inminents and there are a great of cases around of the world where technology can not help directly. The planet has a natural recovery processes that can take large periods of time and technology cannot boost its healing. One of thoses cases is the glacial melt that has raised unimaginable levels, for example, also the most strongest heat waves in summer in recent years that have been so difficult to deal where there have been deaths in the wake of this climate change.
The current state of technology is confined as far as the human being knows until now. People must see reason and understand that there will be a critical point, and if we over pass it nobody could reverse the consequences. Hence, technology can lend a can, but it will not solve the entire environmental problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ch as human cotidianity and its issues. the technological development has helped to...
^^^
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nonetheless,
...nsive accomplishments in general terms. Nonetheless the environmental damage is being irrev...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 9, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('constantly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('race') instead of another adjective.
...s are not willing to invest. This is a constantly race between natural disasters and the impro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'greats'?
Suggestion: greats
...tal risks are inminents and there are a great of cases around of the world where tech...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 479, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'strongest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: strongest
...maginable levels, for example, also the most strongest heat waves in summer in recent years th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 479, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'most the strongest'.
Suggestion: most the strongest
...maginable levels, for example, also the most strongest heat waves in summer in recent years th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, nonetheless, second, so, still, for example, for instance, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2179.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 411.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30170316302 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97985095675 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581508515815 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 693.9 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2139868367 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.055555556 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05555555556 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162458764311 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05142537202 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471798216612 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102854720403 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028875341872 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.