In recent years, learning a new language is common around the world. Some people believe that life will be easier when there are fewer languages globally while others think this is crucial to have several languages in the world. This essay will discuss why a small number of languages will affect in positive ways in the future.
If there are not more languages in the world, communication will get easily in any part of the world. In addition, there are plenty of scopes for students who are looking for abroad studies. For example, English is becoming popular these days, furthermore, most of the universities and colleges are studying in English. As a result, international students communicate with their classmates who are from different nations so having an environment of one language they can speak comfortably. Therefore, it will help in their education. In short, getting a conversation effortlessly with everyone will make a huge role in the young generation life.
Although there are lots of benefits of having fewer languages in the world, major advantage to grow their businesses. There are more opportunities to increase the growth of business and incomes. For instance, a number of brands are selling and earning from foreign nations. So having fewer languages they can communicate with overseas clients smoothly. As a result, they will expand their business and increase the sales of companies. However, some businessman can not communicate with foreign clients so they might not achieve success in the future. Overall, because of few options of languages will improve communication for the growth of the business.
It is increasingly likely that more and more languages will diminish year by year. However, there has been required for communicating with anyone for business and education around the world. Ultimately, getting life easier is crucial for people is important than obsoleting several languages around the world.
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 56
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 56
- the diagram below shows the life cycle of a frog summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 258, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
... the world. This essay will discuss why a small number of languages will affect in positive ways ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...ss why a small number of languages will affect in positive ways in the future. If ther...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, look, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in short, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29677419355 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81433819569 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516129032258 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6184415114 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.4210526316 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3157894737 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05263157895 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322592295111 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101830555867 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10304036394 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224629093632 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111034256979 0.056905535591 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.