Due to tough economic situation and high unemployment rate all over the world, numerous charity organizations have run to help people in humanitarian grounds. It is said that every member of society should have a monetary contribution there. I disagree with this idea because of several reasons and in this essay I will explain them.
First of all, even for worthy causes the donation should be voluntarily not by force or regulation. Every one who own the sum of money, does not matter he born in wealth or worked to earn it, has the absolute right to spend it however he likes. Inducing people to give their money, even to reasonable intentions, is comparable to what thieves are doing violently. A second negative factor is that not all society members can afford to pay an amount of money or charitable reasons in spite of the fact that they receive a considerable income. By this I mean that the majority of people contend with expenses, things like gas, school supplies, and insurance which almost always swallow their salaries and nothing is left behind for benevolent work. Furthermore, if the heads of the households have to withdraw a certain amount of money from their bank account regularly, they feel that like paying bills; an obligation despite of being fair, is unpleasant. Whist it could be seen for example, on the press reports or media those who willingly donate even huge amount of money to the poor, are contented sincerely.
It is true that allocating a fixed sum of money by every individual's income could bring charities foundations to a huge investment and alleviate some social problems like poverty. Despite this, it seems that for many average people, considering others' needs is outweighed by their own requirements.
To conclude, it appears to me that if the financial assistance were to be compulsory, the donors would be discontented and the nature of donation as a voluntarily act would be under question.
- Everybody should donate a fixed amount of their income to support charity How far do you share this view point 82
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement,To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'bore'?
Suggestion: bore
...wn the sum of money, does not matter he born in wealth or worked to earn it, has the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 58, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...llocating a fixed sum of money by every individuals income could bring charities foundation...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 150, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('voluntarily') instead an adjective, or a noun ('act') instead of another adjective.
...contented and the nature of donation as a voluntarily act would be under question.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, for example, i mean, first of all, in spite of, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96636085627 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76560829671 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614678899083 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.3744625808 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.923076923 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1538461538 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135199101835 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466453365893 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0252844019024 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0704427799853 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320679008169 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.