Explain advantages and disadvantages of coeducation in institutes of Pakistan and also state your opinion.
Over the past decade, coeducational institutes are gaining popularity in Pakistan. In my opinion, although there are some drawbacks associated with co-education, but the advantages of this approach clearly outweigh them.
Firstly, the biggest advantage of polysexual institutes is that it provides healthy social interaction between two sexes. Since most workplaces nowadays have sexually diverse workforce, it makes experience in communication with other gender more valuable. For example, a recent global survey conducted by United Nations illustrated that 10% job terminations in 2018 happened due to the lack of ability to integrate with opposite sex.
Secondly, gender diversity results in more creative thinking. It has been proved that both men and women think differently, and these contradicting thoughts are responsible for out of the box thinking. For example, sociologists have proven that creativity dies in the absence of criticism. Therefore, to keep innovations alive, its necessary that these both genders work together.
However, co-education has its own drawback. Problems like sexual harassment become more severe in the polysexual institutes especially in universities because most students experience hormonal changes there. To illustrate, a survey conducted by Human Right Organisation showed that 80 per cent of sexual harassment cases, reported over the period of five years, included 18 to 25 years old attackers but, in my opinion, this behaviour can be controlled by applying strict regulatory rules.
In conclusion, since advantages of co-education, such as healthy social interaction and creativity, exceed its disadvantages, this approach of education is considered superior to monosexual approach.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-03 | Muhammad Hannan Yousaf | 61 | view |
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- In many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on the society? 67
- Nowadays more people are choosing to live with friends or alone rather than with their families. This trend is likely to have a negative impact on communities.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- The chart below shows the changes in gross domestic product (GDP) in the Western Cape between 2000 and 2010. 73
- The chart below gives some of the most reported issues among people living in UK cities in 2008 91
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.91633466135 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1680497317 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.681274900398 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4706356991 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.230769231 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3076923077 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107558040339 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0382872958222 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584926793321 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0658282780451 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708553493971 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.93 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.