Languages are specific features which belong and make nations different and moving throughout eras. They could show national communication methods and influences on the worldwide connection. The global perspective is claimed that a few popular languages are spoken and used in over various countries. Meanwhile, the declining of using other languages would be considered as a positive or negative development. I personally believe in the positive effects for this matter. This essay will show more about my opinions somehow.
Being at the positive usage of languages through the countries, there would be plenty of evidences proving for this issue. For instance, Asia is known as a continent with an enormous numbers of languages using. But, currently, when the world is open and every country has its own right to choose a second language for the nation when contacting and communicating or even co-operating with other countries. English would be a sample for this. Every contract, every single connection between two areas is mostly used in this language. This could also lead to the good links for all users around the globe.
In addition, the understanding would become much more important for any cases. Thus, this priority aspect in all co-operations will be able to change the meaning as well. For example, in a business between two parties from two different nations with particular language using, the role of one single dealing spoken language must be set up for all the good. Throughout any circumstances, a common spoken language will help please all. I personally believe in this good side when having a common spoken language for various countries.
On the other hand, people cannot deny the negative effects happening when other languages are rapidly declining. As these mentioned opinions, languages could show the specifications. So, if a language disappears, the features and specialties will be gone as well. The currently good methodology would be considered now is that how to balance and keep the best and most unique characteristics of every single language in the worldwide line. People possibly use the common languages to apply for their work, business or even personal issues. But, human being for the whole should secure the best qualities of languages that belong to them for as long as they could and find the way-out for using them inside their own nations. An inter-cultural event or an inter-language learning would be a good move for all.
In personal conclusion, I once strongly suppose that people should apply the most common languages for using and connecting people around the world. Also, picking the right features and characteristics from each language for the world learning would be a considering matter for the new world where every nation could get the full understanding and exchange in the same line.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 365, Rule ID: VERY_UNIQUE[1]
Message: Use simply 'unique'.
Suggestion: unique
...at how to balance and keep the best and most unique characteristics of every single languag...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2401.0 1615.20841683 149% => OK
No of words: 461.0 315.596192385 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20824295011 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8300054562 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488069414317 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 738.9 506.74238477 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 16.0721442886 162% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.1080842068 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3461538462 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7307692308 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.96153846154 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229874774334 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765953769099 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661666137793 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146606009073 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705579286173 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.