Fewer and fewer people today write by hand using a pen or pencil.
What are the reasons for this?
Is this a positive or a negative development?
There are fewer people who prefer to write by using a pen or a pencil today, instead they opt for new methods. In this essay, I will explain the reasons for this trend and the positive effects of it.
The decreasing popularity of a traditional writing method can be due to several reasons. The first reason is that typing is a clearer way to depict information. Handwriting is more time-consuming and illegible than typing, especially when under time pressure to finish an essay or a thesis. When people write by hand under time pressure, they cannot ensure the legibility of their own handwriting, thereby causing difficulties while reading. However, by typing using applications such as Google Docs or Words, they can type in many fonts while ensuring the clarity of information for readers. Moreover, instead of writing traditionally, using AI to write requires less effort and time for individuals. They can still note down multiple paragraphs by calling an AI assistant to help in minutes instead of hurting their biceps by writing down on paper for several hours.
In my opinion, I believe that this phenomenon is positive in some aspects. First, it can help people save time while noting information. For example, when being given a 20-page thesis, many students prefer to type and print instead of writing on paper because it can help improve the readability of information for the professors. Another reason is that the traditional way of writing is not applicable to every situation, especially in a time where technology dominates. In a situation when people need to jot down information unexpectedly, such as phone numbers, they cannot always have a pen or paper to take note. By using their own phones or computers, individuals can still store important information without having to carry a stack of paper.
In conclusion, the trend of people not writing traditionally is because of the convenience of typing in terms of readability and effort. However, I believe that this phenomenon can be beneficial by requiring people less time to take note and allowing people to store or write information without using paper.
- People living in the 21st century have a better life quality than people who lived in previous times To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think the manufacturers or shopping malls should sell less packaged products and others argue that people have the responsibility to buy products with less packaging Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- With the pressures on today s young people to succeed academically some people believe that non academic subjects at school eg physical education and cookery should be removed from the syllabus so that children can concentrate wholly on academic subjects 61
- Modern technology has greatly influenced people s ways of entertainment making people less creative Do you agree or disagree 73
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1790.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08522727273 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89458385653 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494318181818 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0393039163 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.294117647 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7058823529 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76470588235 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281384963497 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962630556938 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888888727047 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230865598609 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.151055675822 0.056905535591 265% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1790.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08522727273 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89458385653 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494318181818 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0393039163 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.294117647 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7058823529 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76470588235 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281384963497 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962630556938 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888888727047 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230865598609 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.151055675822 0.056905535591 265% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.