It is evidence that the number of people walk daily is decreasing gradually. This essay will discuss about several factors that might have contribution to this issue and possible solutions to motivate people for walking more.
People's interest in walking for their activities is decline day by day. A recent survey results said that the majority of people living both in city center and rural area now prefer riding or driving than walking. Related to the issue, there are various reasons affecting their preference for using vehicles such as lifestyle and uncomfortable environment. Regarding lifestyle, what we ride or drive are now becoming something essential and associated to social status. The vehicles we have also become one of success symbols although some people do not really need them. Additionally, the other reason which make people more likely not to walk is the uncomfortable environment. For instance, high level of air pollution, damaged pedestrians, and simply hot weather. This environment-related problem would make people choose to use their private vehicles.
To mitigate the issue, we could offer some solutions including the renovation of pedestrians and society education about the benefits of walking. The renovation of pedestrians for becoming more comfortable and green through adding trees or plants at its line will encourage people to walk. They would not be feel not save and hot because of the pollution and weather anymore. In addition, regarding to the lifestyle, the governments and related parties could be together built a campaign and social education about the positive sites of walking on health and economics. We can explain about the impact of walking on our cardiovascular health and the reducing diabetes potency. Furthermore, we should also promote that walking is the cheapest method of transportation that frequently chosen by people in developed countries. Hence, slowly but sure, it would affect people's point of view that walking is more elegant than driving ar riding expensive vehicles in crowded city.
In conclusion, lifestyle and uncomfortable environment are the factors affecting people preference in using their own vehicles. However, paving great and green pedestrians and social campaign would be beneficial solutions to motivate people for spending their time more for walking.
- The table below summarises some data collected by a college bookshop for the month of February 2000 73
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 67
- Many people believe that it is a good idea to have a dress code at work place Do you agree or disagree with statement 67
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 857, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e choose to use their private vehicles. To mitigate the issue, we could offer so...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e people to walk. They would not be feel not save and hot because of the pollutio...
^^
Line 7, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r spending their time more for walking.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, really, regarding, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1988.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47658402204 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88989513689 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550964187328 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8289228911 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.631578947 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1052631579 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.10526315789 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248156535862 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798210518669 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567074874183 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15539732083 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191422248222 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 857, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e choose to use their private vehicles. To mitigate the issue, we could offer so...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e people to walk. They would not be feel not save and hot because of the pollutio...
^^
Line 7, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r spending their time more for walking.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, really, regarding, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1988.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47658402204 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88989513689 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550964187328 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8289228911 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.631578947 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1052631579 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.10526315789 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248156535862 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798210518669 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567074874183 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15539732083 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191422248222 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.