A glance at the tables provided reveal the survey results conducted in 1980 and 2010 about the percentage of six city facilities quality in a particular city. In general, the majority of respondents agreed that all the aspects compared had good quality in both years.
Looking for more detail, there was an increase in the percentage of participants who assessed the city living aspects in good category except in healthcare and transport which dropped by 8% and 13% rescpectively. However, an opposite pattern showed in those who thought that the facilities are neither good nor bad. The percentage of participants who thought so declined in four aspects but healthcare, transport which depicted an increase by 4% and 7% respectively and shops that remained unchanged.
Finally, the respondents who agreed that the city living aspects were in bad condition rose in all aspects in the two decades after the first survey. The highest incline of them reported in employement aspect that jumped by 13% while the other ranged to climb by 4% to 10%.
- The diagram below shows information about member attendance at various clubs in a metro city 84
- An increasing number of advertisement on tv aim at children What are the effect of television advertising Should television advertising be controlled 73
- Some people think that exercise and a good diet are not necessary for a healthy and long life To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The maps below show a science park in 2008 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this case Do you think this is a positive or negative development 56
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the other ranged to climb by 4% to 10%.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, look, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07514450867 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80261592432 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589595375723 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4814239705 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.428571429 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219297289378 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967457732526 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774890916876 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149657283804 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452675554248 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the other ranged to climb by 4% to 10%.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, look, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07514450867 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80261592432 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589595375723 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4814239705 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.428571429 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219297289378 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967457732526 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774890916876 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149657283804 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452675554248 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.